On Dec 6, 2007 2:16 PM, Erik Hetzner <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> If you can't specify the semantics and data model such that SRU atom
> entries look like (more or less) normal atom entries, I fail to see
> the point of using atom at all. If you shove everything of interest
> into atom:content, you miss the advantages of using atom at all.