On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:58 +0100, Edward C. Zimmermann wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:05:10 -0500, Ross Singer wrote
> > On Dec 3, 2007 4:24 PM, Dr R. Sanderson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > > Also, the semantics of what they're actually describing aren't the
> > > clearest.
> > Well, no. From:
> > http://www.atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/#requiredEntryElements
> Before we start to demand this we need to be very clear in our specifications
> what the Id means to us. If we want this we should specify what it so that
> it can have value!
Like I said, the semantics aren't the clearest [when mapping into SRU,
which I should have been more explicit about]. :)