LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2008

ARSCLIST January 2008

Subject:

Re: Mould/Mold

From:

"Richard L. Hess" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:46:10 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (131 lines)

At 04:56 AM 2008-01-23, Steve Puntolillo wrote:
>Hi Marie --
>
>Thanks for bringing this up. I would also be very interested in this info.
>
>Just wondering if anyone else has had to deal with backcoated tape infested
>with mold severe enough to cause the backcoating and oxide layer to merge
>(seemingly) inseparably. I have been searching for info on what to do in
>this situation but have found nothing. Anyone have any ideas?

Hi, Steve,

I am not doubting that mold is a possible (probably) cause of
back-coating and mag-coating bonding to the point of significant
blocking/pinning and causing "pull-outs" of one (or the other or
both) of the coatings when unspooling.

HOWEVER, I have seen this condition in non-moldy tapes as well. It is
rare to be this bad, but it does happen. I have seen several instances of this:
  (a) A tape I received that was already wound through before I got it with
        the oxide half on the back-coating. Wouldn't even spool
properly anymore
  (b) Moldy tapes that were damaged by unspooling (by me) prior to baking as
        the client knew the risk and, at that time, I didn't bake
first. This was only one
        song of which he ended up finding a better copy.
  (c) Non-back-coated tape (possibly 3M176) that had pinning and that horrid
        ripping sound on rewind (this was the first one I encountered) that WAS
        corrected by a dry cold soak inside double plastic bags with
a silica gel desiccant.
  (d) Similar to above, but not corrected with the same
treatment--this one was mostly
        near the hub. Remember (c) and (d) were NOT back-coated.
  (e) 3M201 pins on a regular basis, especially closer to the hub.
For this tape, 1.88 in/s
         de-spooling seems to work. These tapes were stored in SE
Missouri in unknown
         climatic conditions, but the area can be very hot and humid
in the summers.

The British Library under the direction of the late Peter Copeland
(formerly of this list) in circa 2001 (when I had the 3M176 issue)
described their "grandfather clock" which was a 1 RPM unspooler where
the tape was at the bottom of the cabinet, warm, dry air was blown
through the cabinet and the re-spooler was at the top. Peter reported
that they were experiencing trouble with triple-play tape and
developed this tool to help recover this.

Other discussions have talked about a separation "knife" to break the
coatings free of each other. The angles of everything in this
scenario are critical, and I suspect a "follower" would need to be
built that would go inside the reel and keep the angles the same.
Sounds like some of our disc playback friends might have some
suggestions for minimizing error here <smile>.

While I have little/no confirmation of this, I think that one of the
reasons (c) was successful was that there was enough
shrinkage/expansion to break the cross-wrap bonds at a microscopic
level without causing pullouts. Why (d) has not been successful is
anyone's guess. That tape is now in someone else's care as it fits
his mandate for gratis reformatting better than mine.

Dr. Ric Bradshaw (for many years, IBM's tape guru) has suggested that
it was no surprise that back-coated tapes exhibited the type of
pinning that you described, especially under the pressure of the
inner wraps on the reel. Since in at least some instances, the binder
chemistry for the back coat and the mag coat are similar, as the
polymers break down, under the pressure the material can migrate from
one to the other at least to the extent that they can become
inter-twined and cause the effect that you are describing.

As I said at the start, the mold could also act as an "adhesive"
between layers, but in a polyester tape, there are fewer nutrients, I
believe, in the tape for the mold than in an acetate tape.

Thanks, Marie, for the link to the Texas paper on mold. IPA has been
suggested by Peter Brothers as well, but as you especially know, too
much of it can be damaging.

My technique for removing mold is generally something like this:
  (1) Don respirator -- not just a paper mask
  (2) Go to garage where I have a winding machine, food dehydrator,
and dedicated
        old shop vac.
  (3) Open all outside doors (both roll-up ones and the rear personnel door).
  (4) Check repirator
  (5) Remove a tape from its box
  (6) Bag any ancillary paper metadata for possibly sending to a
paper conservator later
  (7) Inspect tape
  (8) If it has noticeable mold in the windows, vacuum first then wipe with
        moist cloth to remove the mold (note: moist could be one of
several fluids).
  (9) If tape needs baking, bake in mold-contaminated food dehydrator
  (10) Wind tape through "mold transport" against wiping pads, changing
         pads as needed
  (11) Inspect tape for obvious signs of mold, if so, repeat (10)
  (12) clean old reel if worth it (i.e. nice aluminum reel), replace
it if not worth it
  (13) discard all paper and reels in outdoor garbage can - destined
for landfill
  (14) if baker was used, run w/o tape for a bit to make sure as much
mold as possible is out
  (15) thoroughly wash hands/arms/face with soap and water

What fluid to use? I have used both IPA and a dilute chlorine bleach
solution. In all instances I inform my client that the mold removal
may have long-term bad effects on the tape and I will generally
digitize these tapes as best as I can at 96/24 assuming they will
never be played again. So far, I have not seen degradation from the
chlorine bleach and in reading some ancillary literature (not related
to tape) it has been said for some types of mold chlorine is a more
effective killer than IPA. I am conflicted on this and need more
information. The Texas paper tried IPA with acetate tape and noticed
some changes in the analysis spectra.

I hate cleaning moldy tapes and ones as bad as Steve describes should
be considered close to terminal.

Regards,

Richard




Richard L. Hess email: [log in to unmask]
Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX
Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager