LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2008

ARSCLIST January 2008

Subject:

Re: Glass Based Records - Seeking Preservation and Transfer Information

From:

Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:16:11 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (102 lines)

On Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:40 AM, Linda Reib wrote;

> We located a box with 4 glass based records. Initial investigation 
> shows that they are speeches from the 1940's. I am not familiar with 
> this type of media.

The media is referred to as Electronic Transcription (ET) discs.

Electronic Transcription discs pre-date magnetic recording (ie. wire
and magnetic tape).  ETs consist of a substrate (fiber, aluminum,
steel or glass) coated with a soft material (nitrocellulose) in which
the grooves are cut.  ETs were used to record performances and talks 
in the same way that magnetic tape was later used.

The glass substrate is particularly fragile.  If the discs are 
shipped, good packaging and double boxing are required.


> 2 - are 78's and have been transferred to cassette in 1988. The 
> glass recordings seem okay at first glance (novice opinion). I 
> did not pull the records out of the sleeves. The cassettes are 
> in questionable condition (dirt w/ possible rust).

In this case, I would recommend transferring from the original 
disc rather than trying to preserve the cassette.  If the discs
are in good condition, this may be more cost effective than 
trying to preserve the cassettes.  Ideally, you might transfer
both and see which media provides the best results, since both
the discs and the cassettes have probably deteriorated since 
1988.  It sounds from your description like the cassettes 
deteriorated more than the discs over the past 20 years.


> 2 - are very large 33 1/3, they have not been transferred. One 
> has extreme flaking of the top coating as I looked into the 
> sleeve.

These discs are only going to continue to deteriorate.


> All 4 are stored in acid free sleeves, but it a box so large 
> that they slide around.

If you have sleeves that are of the appropriate size for the discs,
and it is only the sleeved discs that are sliding in the box, then
some padding between the sleeve and the box to prevent sliding is
all that is needed.

Perhaps an archivist on this list may be able to suggest an
appropriate padding or filler.

Otherwise, splitting up the discs by size and placing them in
appropriately sized boxes may make the most sense.


> Could anyone recommend what to do next? Our goal would be 
> preserve and transfer the sound track if possible. I would 
> like to know how to store or re-box these items to stabilize 
> their condition right now. I would then work on finding a lab to 
> transfer the recordings to a usable media.

Acid-free sleeves are the correct way to store ETs.  ETs degrade
by several modes: (1) thermal expansion and contraction, (2)
hygroscopic expansion due to attraction of moisture, and (3) 
palmitic and stearic acid formation which is an autocatylitic 
reaction (ie. once started, it accelerates).  Environmental 
conditions are therefore very important: (1) stable temperature,
(2) low humidity, and (3) acid-free sleeves.

Question: do you see any white waxy substance on the surface
of the disc?  Sometimes it looks like a whitish haze or dust,
and other times it can appear like a waxy coating.  If you do
see this, then you have palmitic and stearic acid formations
on the disc surface, meaning that your disc(s) are deteriorating
more rapidly.


> Is it even possible to save the two 33 1/3 recordings?

Perhaps some, but unclear how much.  It depends on how much of the 
laminate remains adhered to the glass substrate, and in what condition
that remainder is in.  There's pretty much no way to tell in advance
without an audio expert inspecting the actual discs.

There are new imaging technologies that will be available in the
future that may or may not be able to handle badly deteriorated 
discs.  The question is, do you bet on the discs surviving until
such technology is available to you (unclear whether it will work
or not on discs in bad condition), or do you proceed in saving
what you have now.  I would assume that broad access to new 
technology is at least 3-5 years away while it is being proved 
out and refined by a few organizations in the meantime.



Eric Jacobs

The Audio Archive, Inc.
tel: 408.221.2128
fax: 408.549.9867
mailto:[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager