On 25/01/08, Richard Warren wrote:
> Dear Jim and ARSClisters,
> This is just a couple of quick reactions to the posting:
> First: BRAVO -- you made the point very well - congratulations !
> Second: Could it be that this poor-quality distribution exists
> because most listeners are in fact listening on their earbuds or
> computer-speakers or mini-systems that attach to computers and thus
> wouldn't even notice (or, sadly, wouldn't care) if sound quality were
> good ? Anyway, no, Jim, it's not just you; but junky sound is there
> and easy. Those who care do indeed need to speak up and speak loudly
> about quality.
I think the junky sound is probably about the same quality as the record
player I had when I was a student.
[log in to unmask]