LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  March 2008

EDUCAT March 2008

Subject:

Re: Ethics in Cataloging

From:

Janet Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:27:12 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (54 lines)

Long ago I gave a paper on ethics in cataloging.   It was called:
"Cataloging as a Subjective Activity" at Health Sciences Users Group of OCLC
(Online Computer Library Center) Annual Meeting, Chapel Hill, NC, 4/94
(keynote).  

When I was contacted to do the keynote speech, I offered ethics as my topic
of choice, because of a conversation that had recently happened on AUTOCAT,
where someone asked if there really WERE any ethical issues in cataloging
other than creating and assigning non-biased subject headings.   I was
horrified that the question could even be asked.

Anyhow, Here are some ethical issues raised by the LC Working Group Report:

The ethics of being willing to share the burden/responsibility for providing
bibliographic access to information resources vs. choosing to rely on the
work of others:   If your institution is a major research institution (an
ARL library, for instance), and the size of your budget and staff is
proportionately larger than that at most other institutions, and your
collecting brings in materials well beyond the "mainstream" ... is it
ethical of you to decide that you will not contribute full original records
to the national databases (but instead to outsource as much as you can and
do only brief, possibly not-share records for the remainder)?  Is it ethical
to decide not to participate in cooperative projects such as NACO, PCC, etc.
when you actually have enough catalogers to make it possible?  If yours is
an educational institution, interested in the dissemination and creation of
knowledge, is it ethical not to share records/information for your rare,
unique, materials on WorldCat?

Or, one of my longtime favorites:

The ethics of choosing to hire only experienced catalogers when you have a
large enough operation to enable you to hire entry-level catalogers and
provide the training they will require.

You can tell, from the way I phrased them, how I feel about these issues.
But it is distressing to me that people might make it through library
school, and through at least one class in the organization of information
without some understanding that they are entering a PROFESSION (something
you profess), instead of just getting ready to take a job, and that that
they might have been so little exposed to the mores and values of the
profession that they don't understand that their whole career will be a
process of choosing between right and wrong --- that is a MORAL/ETHICAL
right and wrong, not just a "did I manage to figure out the right
classification number?" kind of right/wrong.

Janet Swan Hill, Professor
Associate Director for Technical Services
University of Colorado Libraries, CB184
Boulder, CO 80309
[log in to unmask]
     *****
Tradition is the handing-on of Fire, and not the worship of Ashes.
- Gustave Mahler

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager