The misunderstanding has to do with the following:

- You proposed DCX for "DC + RMD"
- I use DCX for "DC + ANY from different namespaces"
- What I understand now from your current message is that you propose to
have a schema for "DC + ANY within a single namespace"

Actually there is also a need for a "catch all" namespace but that
should not be confused with the DCX recordSchema. 

Theo



-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Namens Ray Denenberg
Verzonden: donderdag 3 april 2008 13:53
Aan: [log in to unmask]
Onderwerp: Re: SRU Record Metadata and DCX Schema (was: Price
information in SRU responses)

From:  Mike Taylor
>the proposed DC+RMD schema is potentially useful, but it doesn't solve
the
problem that this thread is addressing.


To be clear: the solution outlined in my first message doesn't solve the
problem, but are you saying that the amended proposal also doesn't?

That is, to add an additional 'any' element to the schema for an
additional
namespace, this second namespace for descriptive  data where we can put
useful elements, one of which would be 'price'.

(In any case we'll call this something other than DCX. I had thought
from
the earlier discussion that Theo wanted me to call it DCX but I suppose
I
misunderstood.)

--Ray