From: Mike Taylor
>the proposed DC+RMD schema is potentially useful, but it doesn't solve the
problem that this thread is addressing.
To be clear: the solution outlined in my first message doesn't solve the
problem, but are you saying that the amended proposal also doesn't?
That is, to add an additional 'any' element to the schema for an additional
namespace, this second namespace for descriptive data where we can put
useful elements, one of which would be 'price'.
(In any case we'll call this something other than DCX. I had thought from
the earlier discussion that Theo wanted me to call it DCX but I suppose I