LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  July 2008

ARSCLIST July 2008

Subject:

Re: The Evolution of the Music Business

From:

Mark Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:51:34 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (288 lines)

Tom,

I totally agree with all of your statements below.  In fact, it's the
direction that our company is working towards (we're not selling direct
to the consumer yet, but I do see the day when this will happen, and
similar to the way you describe).  Up to this point iTunes has
discouraged variable track pricing (for some unknown reason), but we
manipulate our album pricing to make it a much more reasonable deal for
the consumer (obviously, at this point, in the US, the mechanical
copyright costs are a limiting factor, because on digital downloads in
the US, the full statutory PHYSICAL mechanical rate of US$0.091 per
track is being collected in exchange for clearance by Harry Fox, even
though (as of yet--but probably this fall this will change) there is no
statutory rate for digital downloads.  I personally would love to see a
viable lossless format for downloads, in ALL genres (there are a few
classical sites that do this on a limited basis, of course) as an
alternative to iTunes, and I think this is something we will be looking
at as a company in the near future, whether via FLAC, .aiff or .wav.

In regards to your comment about de-leveraging manufacturing and
distribution assets, we did that as a company 7 or 8 years ago.  All
warehousing and manufacturing for us is done by third parties, and even
inventory doesn't shift to our books necessarily upon manufacture (it
depends on rate of sale, time of year when manufactured--a lot of the
summer is utilized by pressing plants in anticipating product needs in
the 4th quarter, and it allows them more efficient ways of utilizing
their equipment and staff, but the excess inventory may remain on their
books until needed).  

The valuation of content companies will, of course, be more predictable
and definable the more that digital becomes the greater share of the
business.  Instead of inventory, returns, and other factors that are
currently factors in valuing content companies, these will be replaced
by a more manageable, definable revenue stream which the marketplace can
depend upon.  The profitability issue, as you are correct on in regards
to today's marketplace, will also undergo some revision as some of the
"shotgun" disadvantages of launching new artists (millions of unsold
units of inventory, for example) are taken out of the picture.


Mark Jenkins
President, Licensing Division
Madacy Entertainment LP/Countdown Media
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:37 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Wonderful Mercury Reissues

I think, if Big Music is to ever save itself, it will eventually get out
of the manufactured-CD 
business except for huge hits sold at Wal-Mart and the equiv. in other
countries. Niche-market stuff 
like Classical and Jazz will be sold as downloadable digital files. Now,
the key question is --  
what's the profitable play? I think the copyright owners should sell
CD-quality (or better) 
downloads directly to the public, at $1 per song or $10 per album, and
include downloads of 
printable, high resolution graphics so those so inclined can burn and
make art for a close proximity 
of a real CD. Amazon is already driving down the price of lossy-format,
low-quality downloads and I 
can see these settling at 25-50 cents per song or about $5 or less per
album, which is more of a 
reasonable price (although I still wouldn't pay my own money for
low-grade lossy formats of anything 
that sounds the least bit decent). Thus iTunes and Amazon can fight over
the commodity price of 
lossy formats and the copyright owners could retain the full-quality
market and price it to be 
profitable (if they can make money off $15 CD's, with manufacturing
infrastructure having to be 
supported, distribution networks taking a cut and retailers taking a
cut, surely they can make more 
money at $10 downloads sold right to the public -- if not, they will
never have a viable business 
model).

If I were making strategic decisions for a large copyright holder, I
would begin now by 
de-leveraging my manufacturing and distribution assets. The thinking is
-- let 3rd parties hold the 
real estate, labor costs and capital of production plants and warehouses
and contract-manufacture 
the few dozen titles a year that will sell enough copies to justify
distribution thru the Wal-Marts 
of the world. Everything else (and I do mean _everything_ that's in the
vaults) would be sold 
direct-to-consumer as downloads. The revenue structure changes to more
of a annuity than quarterly 
quests for hits, so perhaps this business model is not what Wall Street
would prefer, at first. But, 
over time, if it's run right, the revenue stream starts to resemble a
utility company and such 
things as reliable dividends can be set up and thus the stock becomes a
good long-term play. The key 
thing Wall Street has to get out of its system is the myth that the
music business is wildly 
profitable -- it's not and it never has been. Hits are a fluke,
slow-building revenue over time is 
the rule, especially with niche genres like classical and jazz. With
popular music, the 
profitability of mega-hits is eroded by all the misses in a catalog each
year.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Abrams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Wonderful Mercury Reissues


> When I tried ordering from Archiv a few years ago they were not
sending anything abroad.
>
> I have found that I can frequently obtain CDs from Amazon.Com at
better prices than ordering from 
> the UK.
>
> For example, the most recent Living Stereo SACDs are  11.98 USD, with
several a dollars less and 
> older items at less than 9 USD. Shipping to the UK is 3 USD.  Most
items can be bought new at 
> lower prices from associate sellers.  By contrast the price for recent
issues from Amazon UK is 
> 13.99 GBP plus 1.24 GBP shipping.  That is the equivalent of 30.5 USD,
nearly three times the 
> price.  The records sold by Amazon UK are pressed in Europe. Also
shipping from America is almost 
> as fast as from the UK.
>
> UK prices do include 17.5 per cent "purchase tax."
>
> Buying records directly in the UK I have had the best luck with a firm
called Crotchet, who also 
> send records abroad.  Otherwise I buy directly from companies such as
Symposium and Preiser.  I 
> have also had good luck dealing directly (by email) with Bongiovanni
in Italy.
>
> Steve Abrams
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Wonderful Mercury Reissues
>
>
>> You are correct, some of the newer ArkivCD's do indeed have full
booklets. But the Mercury were 
>> in the original ArkivCD series and unless they started reproducing
the booklets somewhere along 
>> the lines, they did not as of a year or so ago.
>>
>> As for shipping to Europe, I wonder if that has to do with specific
ArkivCD license agreements --  
>> were you ordering a BMG/Sony title the time you had trouble?
>>
>> Here in the states, I've had generally good luck tracking down "new
and used" options on Amazon 
>> for out-of-print classical stuff, but not always. Some titles are
ridiculously expensive used and 
>> one then wonders what genius bean-counter at Big Music Co X decided
to take it out of print if it 
>> obviously is still in demand enough to command high prices used. But
many other titles can be had 
>> cheaper than original street prices, sometimes still shrink-wrapped.
There are a few companies, 
>> Newbury Comics, ImportCD's, etc, that must have bought out inventory
from dead record-store 
>> chains at pennies on the dollar and can now sell out-of-print but
still shrinkwrapped titles for 
>> $5-8 each. For instance, I was able to get several titles from the
original RCA Living Stereo 
>> reissue CD's that are now out of print but never issued on hybrid
SACD's for a few bucks each, 
>> still new in the wrapping and not RCA Music Club editions. Same with
several of the late 90's 
>> Decca Originals reissues.
>>
>> None of this is to cast any aspersions on ArkivCD -- those guys are
doing a great service to 
>> music and music fans.
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve Abrams" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:56 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Wonderful Mercury Reissues
>>
>>
>>> Some Arkiv reissues are now being produced with booklets.  I just
purchased my first Arkiv 
>>> edition - the RCA transfer of the 1947 recording of "Four Saints in
Three Acts".  This CD was 
>>> never available in Europe, so far as I know, and has become quite
difficult to find second hand.
>>> The transfer is excellent and the 32 page booklet with Gertrude
Stein's libretto is included.
>>>
>>> There was no problem ordering from the UK.  Some time back when I
tried ordering from Arkiv they 
>>> would not sent stuff abroad.
>>>
>>> SA   TTTTTTT
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Tom Fine" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 10:39 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Wonderful Mercury Reissues
>>>
>>>
>>>> The ArkivCD's should be CDR "clones" of now-out-of-catalog CD's. I
tried a couple and they 
>>>> sound fine to my ears, keeping in mind that CDR media can be more
fragile than manufactured 
>>>> CD's. Too bad they don't reproduce the booklets, which were sweated
over profusely. Since 
>>>> Universal chose to take so much of the catalog out of print, this
is the only way to hear a lot 
>>>> of this material if you missed the original CD's. Arkiv does a nice
job keeping the brand 
>>>> alive. By the way, they have also reissued a bunch of other
Universal material, particularly 
>>>> Decca and DGG. And they have a bunch of EMI and Sony/BMG reissues
out there also. I think the 
>>>> ArkivCD program is now well north of 2000 titles.
>>>>
>>>> -- Tom Fine
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "Roderic G Stephens" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 12:06 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Wonderful Mercury Reissues
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been very pleased with my Arkiv CD purchases in
>>>>> the past, but I thought you all should know about the
>>>>> Mercuries that are being reissued by the label, and
>>>>> I'd be interested in any comments regarding them by
>>>>> Tom Fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is from an email I just received from them:
>>>>>
>>>>> "It's been an audiophile extravaganza this month at
>>>>> ArkivMusic, with our sales on the fabulous BIS label
>>>>> from Sweden (lots of titles back in stock!) and the
>>>>> RCA Classic Film Scores series (my favorites this week
>>>>> are the film scores for Errol Flynn and the Prince
>>>>> Valiant Suite from Franz Waxman).
>>>>> We round out the month with one of the most
>>>>> fascinating audiophile labels of all, Mercury Living
>>>>> Presence. Mercury was a special label in many ways, an
>>>>> American company, from the heyday of classical
>>>>> recording in the U.S., that reproduced some of the
>>>>> most sonically realistic sounds at the dawn of the
>>>>> stereo era. Precious few stereo LPs were pressed when
>>>>> these recordings were issued, and they became some of
>>>>> the rarest and most collectible classical discs ever.
>>>>> ArkivMusic has now reissued over 60 releases from the
>>>>> Mercury catalog, all of which are on sale for a
>>>>> limited time."
>>>>>
>>>>> Rod Stephens
>>>>>
>>>
> 
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
Access to this email by anyone other than the addressee is unauthorized.

****************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager