Does no one use Bias Peak Pro and Bias Soap pro? I used this
combination to copy and process about 1500 LPs and it seemed to me to
be excellent. Some were desperate saves and the software seemed to
deal with just about any problem. It does need a fast computer and a
fair amount of ram but I assume that's the case with any audio
software. It does have a learning curve but many of the functions one
doesn't use so that's not a great problem. I have not used the
software listed below.
On Aug 15, 2008, at 8:07 AM, Richard L. Hess wrote:
> Hi, Sam, and Tom, and the original poster,
> I will admit to being a happy Magix/Samplitude user for ten years
> now. I think there are several packages in this line that offer
> substantial value.
> (1) Magix Audio Cleaning Lab - definitely an amateur product, but
> it has some cut-down versions of the high-end stuff and is
> available for download for $35 and a free trial is available. May
> be limited to CD-rate only.
> (2) For INGEST only (won't burn CDs, but will make WAV files, very
> limited processing compared to (1) and (3) but is a peek into the
> beginning of the "real deal" Samplitude -- version 9 SE
> http://www.samplitude.com/eng/sam/se.html $50 Euros for download
> (3) A very competent mastering (stereo) solution with the
> restoration tools built in. Samplitude V10 Master, http://
> www.samplitude.com/eng/sam/master.html for 249 Euros, but may still
> be available for $299 US (see OrangeHill link, below).
> There is a generic version (w/o restoration tools) for 30-day free
> trial available here:
> The Samplitude US pricing is available here from OrangeHill Audio:
> I am currently using Samplitude version 10.1 PRO and the
> restoration suite which is included in MASTER but an option in PRO
> plus the Algorithmix Noise Free Pro plug-in. At MAP on the
> OrangeHill site, that's $2599 worth of software if you bought it
> Version differences are here:
> However, I think that a reasonable suite could be made from:
> Samplitude 9 SE for ingest (four stereo programs at a time)
> Samplitude 10 master for cleanup (one at a time)
> The ideal arrangement, as I see it, would be an ingest PC running
> SE and four playback decks, recording to its hard drive. An auto-
> run ViceVersa Pro instance pushing those ingests to a server system
> (or at least a pair of NAS boxes) and then the cleanup workstation
> (s) work directly off the server/NAS over Gigabit Ethernet. I'm
> doing something somewhat similar in my workflow and it works.
> That's less than $400 worth of software and it's very competent.
> With competent used Dell Optiplexes available in this neck of the
> woods for ~$500 tricked out as you'd need for audio (3 GHz
> processor, 1 GB of RAM, 250 GB D: drive for data) you can set up a
> useable "factory" for $1400 plus your monitor speakers (another
> $1400 or so - Mackie HR824s are a good choice and if you can get
> the original version used, that would be great) and then a good
> audio interface (I like the RME Multiface II a lot - it has
> switchable gain so it can work with IHF levels directly). That's
> another $1000 or so. This means a very competent setup for multi-
> ingest and single-processing (in parallel) could be set up for
> approximately $4000 which, while not peanuts, is far less than the
> cost of another person and would allow substantial throughput --
> perhaps as much as four people doing single-element transfers.
> The multiple ingest model only works if you scan all of the files
> for defects during a post session. This model permits that, but you
> can do that quickly and then render the MP3 access file and move on.
> I use an earlier version of Samplitude SE to do 8-channel ingest in
> parallel with the 16-channel ingest I can do with my setup under
> Samplitude PRO. These run on two workstations as I have an 8-
> channel interface on my aux workstation and a 16-channel interface
> on my main one...but I don't have any 24-track playback
> capabilities (i.e. from one tape).
> I will be the first to admit that the learning curve of Samplitude
> is steep, but no steeper than Audacity--at least for me. There are
> videos on their website that might help. However, if you could get
> an hour on the phone with someone after you've run through the
> tutorials it would help.
> So, here's the software I'm currently using on a regular day in/day
> out basis:
> Samplitude 10.1 Pro
> Samplitude Restoration Plug-ins (most notably the de-clicker/de-
> and not just on grooved-media-derived files (which I don't
> officially do))
> Algorithmix Noise-Free Pro
> RME Total Mix
> RME DigiCheck analyzer and stereo scope display
> FastSum MD5 generator
> Here's the software I use perhaps once every month or two:
> Here's the software loaded on my machine that I don't think I've
> used for six months or more:
> Diamond Cut (DC6--I didn't bother to upgrade to 7)
> Sorry this got long, but I wanted to provide specific models.
> Please don't cheap out, even on oral histories -- if your oral
> histories are anything like the ones I'm doing, they need all the
> help they can get.
> At 09:32 AM 2008-08-15, Sam Brylawski wrote:
>> Sorry for the mistyping on Soundforge, Tom . I didn't mean to imply
>> that I thought that Audacity was in a league with Soundforge and any
>> other professional applications.
> Richard L. Hess email: [log in to unmask]
> Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX
> Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/
> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.