LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2008

ARSCLIST August 2008

Subject:

Re: The Hope of Audacity Was--Re: [ARSCLIST] Seeking recommendations for oral history digitization equipment (fwd)

From:

Mike Hirst <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:14:25 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (93 lines)

I've been going over the recent exchanges re different software 
recommendations. I started audio editing in the days of razor blades and 
splicing blocks when I was co-presenting a programme for the BBC Night 
Northern Network. My introduction to digital mastering, post-production 
and broadcasting facilities was working with SADiE c.1996.

http://www.sadie.com/about/profile.html

Around the same time I started building my own digital studio. The 
budget was tight, so I started working with Cool Edit. Despite having 
subsequently worked with Soudforge, Cubase, Wavelab and Pro Tools I keep 
coming back to CoolEdit/Adobe Audition. I guess Rod Stephens is right 
when I talks about sticking within our own 'comfort levels'.

With regard to the current debate, it has always been my understanding 
that given well set up, clean and well maintained analogue playback and 
a soundcard/digital interface with a good spec AD converter the choice 
of software will have no impact on the quality of digital capture. 
Indeed I can capture audio without using GUI software at all. Using my 
M-Audio soundcard and Brett Bartholomew's command line utility cmd2wav

http://www.bartdart.com/downloads/cmd2wav.zip

I can capture audio with a 32bit resolution and a sampling rate of 96KHz 
from the command line with no problem at all.

However, reading Goran Finnberg's comments re the work dome by George 
Blood, I am surprised to find that different combinations of software 
and hardware can produce different results. Am I to understand that 
Adobe Audition, for example, will capture audio differently when used 
with an M-Audio card, for example, than it would when combined with an 
E-MU or SoundBlaster card? does it then follow that the same card 
combined with different software would produce different results? Is 
this something I should worry about? What is the extent of this 
discrepancy and how best can I avoid it?

Goran Finnberg wrote:
> Craig Breaden:
> 
>> Bob, you may be right.  Perhaps a comparison of free
>> (or bundled) softwares is in order to see how quality 
>> of the output WAV varies.
>> This information could then be passed on to archives
>> who could use it.
> 
> 
> Some time ago George Blood of Safe Sound Archive, 
> 
> http://www.safesoundarchive.com/
> 
> spoke of comparision tests done on several software programs and
> soundcards showing wide differences in the quality of the software and
> its interaction with the soundcards.
> 
> I got the impression that this was told during an ARSC presentation.
> 
> He very generously offered the power point presentation from his speech
> and it really was of great interest to me confirming my extectations of
> simple programs.
> 
> Tested 6 different hardware paired with 7 different softwares.
> 
> George Blood:
> 
> 
>> 3.  The problems we found occur at staggeringly high rates -- above 85% of all files failed bit-level certification.  And this rate occurs with so many combinations of hardware, software, drivers, operating systems, that finding the root cause is extremely difficult.
> 
> As always the DAW´s that cost sizable money, Sonic Solutions, was
> perfect in all respects but the rest.........
> 
> I would suggest you contact him at http://www.safesoundarchive.com/
> 
> to get your copy of the power point presentation to learn part of what
> he found out at cost to him.
> 
> When problems occur it _will_ cost you some way or the other that is for
> sure in my experience.
> 
> 

-- 
Mike Hirst
Managing Director
DAS-360°
16 Ocean View
Whitley Bay
Tyne & Wear
NE26 1AL

tel: 0191 289 3186
email: [log in to unmask]
web: http://www.das360.net

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager