LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2008

ARSCLIST August 2008

Subject:

Re: ELP Turntable (Re(2): [ARSCLIST] RIAA EQ software)

From:

Roderic G Stephens <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:20:27 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (223 lines)

Hey Tom,

With your "shivering timbers" (an old sea fairing term), I hope you're not accusing Ken of "pirating".

Rod



--- On Thu, 8/28/08, Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] ELP Turntable  (Re(2): [ARSCLIST] RIAA EQ software)
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 3:25 AM
> Hi Ken:
> 
> I'm not about to argue with the substance of your
> postings. Listening is a very subjective thing and 
> trying to pry an "analog guy" away from his tapes
> and records is like, well, choose your analogy --  
> bottom line is it's impssible and not worth trying.
> 
> However, in the ARCHIVAL world, the goal isn't
> shivering timbers, it's preservation. In today's 
> world, that generally means transferring aging analog
> material to digital, and hopefully making an 
> accurate and high-resolution enough transfer that it
> needn't be done again and the analog media can 
> rot away without being lost to time. I would say the art
> keeps advancing so we're not in this ideal 
> place yet, but there are good practices and a grade of
> equipment that can do a good job.
> 
> All of this is very different from the audiophile world,
> where pleasure-listening and shivering 
> timbers are the goals (and WORTHY goals -- let me be clear
> about that -- this giant pool of recorded 
> media, especially the "great art" part of it,
> SHOULD shiver timbers). It's a whole different 
> aesthetic and definitely different requirements from the
> hardware and software. It's somewhat 
> related to content-collecting but I've known some guys
> (it's always guys) with very expensive and 
> good-sounding rigs and maybe 100 different music sources --
> so their goal is to listen to their 
> equipment, not music, per se.
> 
> The simple fact about analog media is, no matter how
> euphonic the end results, it is quite a bit 
> farther from output = input to the best digital media.
> Therefore, it is inherently distorted and 
> non-faithful to its source. There are cases where this is
> much less so than others, but the limits 
> of the media just don't compare to proper
> implementation of digital, especially given a couple of 
> decades of improvement to digital now (remember how lousy
> transistors sounded when they were new in 
> audio gear? same can be said about digital -- new stuff
> needs some time to evolve, the design 
> engineers need to figure out what works best).
> 
> Now, a bad side-effect of ever-cheaper and
> good-to-excellent digital has been the de-evolution of 
> the music business to where anyone with a Mac is a
> "recording engineer" and so the ART of proper 
> recording, at least as far as music is concerned, is dying.
> This art and craft was a combination of 
> knowledge, technical skill, taste and aesthetics that
> developed among the best in the trade into a 
> clear-eyed understanding of what worked and what didn't
> with different types of music, recording 
> spaces, equipment and audiences. I would say part of the
> problem today is that too much recorded 
> music is made in a "bubble" without on-site
> feedback and handling, so people develop inward-looking 
> aesthetics and never learn the "general rules" of
> the craft. But I digress...
> 
> My point is, audiophillic listening and audiophile
> equipment is a whole different thing from a 
> professional archival-transfer setup. The audiophile mags
> themselves (at least Stereophile and TAS, 
> the two I occasionally read) call the high-end thing a
> "hobby." Professional transfer work is just 
> that, a profession, and thus one tries to stay away from
> the subjectivity inherent in 
> pleasure-listening.
> 
> -- Tom Fine
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ken Fritz"
> <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] ELP Turntable (Re(2): [ARSCLIST]
> RIAA EQ software)
> 
> 
> Hi David,
> 
>    If you have a Monks cleaning machine, we need to give
> you a pass
> on the cars.
> 
>    Tonight I played more tapes on my ATR.  Sue has no idea
> as to the
> cost of the ATR  as I' dragged about 30  pro RTR
> machines home over
> the last year. They all look the same and she's gotten
> used to it.
> The ATR is different as it looks new. Sue has overlooked
> the
> acoutrements of the machines so they all look the same to
> her, that's
> good for me!! She knows that tape machines are old and
> cheap<*>
> 
>    The sound of great analog can be appreciated on a system
>  set up
> in an appropriate room  with good gear. Neither the room
> nor gear
> need to be expansive or expensive, but it helps.
> 
>    Those of you that have the ability to record live music
> in a real
> space can appreciate the talent you've refined over the
> years. Being
> an audiophile, I have the option of listening to the music
> recorded
> by the best; whatever the medium will be.
> 
>    Ken
> On Aug 27, 2008, at 10:45 PM, David Lennick wrote:
> 
> > I can't remember the last time my timbers were
> shivered. But my  faithful Monks Record Cleaning 
> > Machine cost more than my first two  cars combined.
> >
> > dl
> >
> > Ken Fritz wrote:
> >> Gentleman,
> >>   If you play LP's on a Silvertone changer,
> handed down from your  dad, listen on a system from 
> >> Best Buy, You'll concur with this  posting.
> >>   With all due respect to those that posted to
> this topic, Vinyl  cleaned properly, played on a 
> >> top of the line TT - arm -  cartridge  set up will
> sound good enough to shiver your timbers.  In 
> >> some cases, the cost of a vinyl playback system to
> shiver  your  timbers  may cost as much as a a 
> >> fine German sports car.
> >>   Until you hear vinyl on a GREAT system, you
> won't realize how  good the medium of the past 
> >> really is.
> >>   Being  an  analog  guy myself;  CD's,
> digital and pro tools take  second place to the sound my 
> >> Ampex ATR , Koetsu, Dynavector and  My Sonic Labs
> cartridges deliver.   Being 66 years of age,  I 
> >> may  be wrong but my ears are happy.
> >>   Relax, and enjoy the music. Ken
> >> On Aug 27, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Charles Lawson wrote:
> >>> Tom Fine writes:
> >>>> The LP has just too many limitations --
> fuzzy midrange on peaks,  ticks
> >>>> and pops, rumble
> >>>> and surface noise, poor channel separation
> at certain  frequencies. It's
> >>>> always amazing to me when
> >>>> the things sound great -- I tip my hat to
> the mastering folks and
> >>>> pressing folks who make that
> >>>> happen. I'm old enough to remember the
> era before CD's. NO THANKS!
> >>>
> >>> I’m right there with you, Tom.  I’d never
> go back.
> >>>
> >>> I hope it was clear from my postings that I am
> not *advocating*  using disc
> >>> restorations as the preferred method of
> transferring older  recordings to
> >>> the digital realm.  I am only noting that, in
> some cases when the  master
> >>> tapes have deteriorated far enough, disc
> restorations can yield a  more
> >>> listenable product than the bad masters.  OF
> COURSE digital re- issues
> >>> should be made from original source materials
> if those materials are
> >>> well-cared-for and in good shape.  However, I
> have heard (and own  a few)
> >>> major label CD re-issues that suffer from all
> sorts of problems  that the
> >>> same material originally issued on LP does not
> exhibit—and it’s  not just
> >>> poor quality-control at the digital
> remastering stage.
> >>>
> >>> The LP as a medium has all kinds of problems
> that bug me (as LPs  always
> >>> have!), but some of my old LPs when thoroughly
> cleaned and played  through
> >>> the LT with DSP EQ, etc. yield a more
> listenable product than  some of the
> >>> CD re-issues that supposedly use original
> masters.  Properly  manufactured
> >>> vinyl will generally hold up better than audio
> tape.  It’s just  physics.
> >>>
> >>> I am booked up pretty solidly for the next
> little while, but if I  can put
> >>> together a few A-Bs, I’ll be happy to share
> ’em.
> >>>
> >>> Chas.
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> Charles Lawson <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Professional Audio for CD, DVD, Broadcast
> & Internet

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager