LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  September 2008

ARSCLIST September 2008

Subject:

Re: Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)

From:

Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:47:08 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (144 lines)

Prentice, Will wrote:
> I don't think Peter's reference to Victor's multiple limiters and the
> Wireless World article are related. The article actually does cover
> de-emphasis, stating "A system of pre-emphasis and compensation with
> what has been termed the "orthacoustic characteristic" has recently been
> developed..."
>
> Regards
>
> Will 
>   

Then this has nothing to do with recording phonograph records.  This 
system was used only for 16-inch 33 1/3 RPM broadcast transcriptions.  
Part of the specifications include the minimum inner grove diameter of 
8-inches.  It was originally announced on Sept 15, 1939, and revisions 
were made to the spec sheet on March 30, 1942 and May 25, 1943 which is 
the version I have.  These two revisions cover the mentioning of the NAB 
curve introduced in 1942 and the RCA Universal Lateral/Vertical pick-up 
and compensation filter introduced around those dates. 

RCA did manufacture a Limiting Amplifier at that time, the 86-A, 
MI-11216, but it is designed to work at line level for the composite 
feed to a transmitter or recorder.  It is rack mounted and takes an 
8-inch high space.  It would take a whole rack full of them to use 
independently on each mic.  Additionally, each mic would have to be 
pre-amped and amped up into the limiter, and the output padded down to 
go to the mixer.  They didn't do things internally in the board back in 
those days!  The catalog also mentions a 96-AX Deluxe Limiting Amplifier 
but it is not included in the 1941 broadcast equipment catalog I have. 

Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Michael Biel
> Sent: 29 September 2008 20:14
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Peter Copeland on RCA Victor recordings (1941)
>
> Prentice, Will wrote:
>   
>> Doug and all
>>
>> I've looked up this edition of Wireless World, but there's no mention
>>     
> of
>   
>> Victor's use of limiters I'm afraid. It's a short, 3 paragraph article
>> entitled "New Recording Characteristic: Reducing Noise Level"
>>     
> describing
>   
>> in general terms the idea behind pre-emphasis. 
>>   
>>     
>
> I think the key word here is the use of the word "level" in the 
> headline.  Since limiters adjust level, could he have misinterpreted it 
> to mean that this EQ was adjusting levels?  As we know now, a 
> pre-emphasis properly works only if there is a calibrated reciprocal 
> de-emphasis on the playback end.  Consumer phonographs did not have 
> actual de-emphasis circuits at that time, only professional turntables 
> in broadcasting had them for the newly emerging Orthocoustic and NAB 
> curves.  Unlike Dolby and DBX, these units were completely passive.  Was
>
> Peter possibly claiming that RCA was using limiters as an active EQ, 
> several decades in advance of Dolby?   And what was the 1941 Wireless 
> World article detailing?  Orthocoustic had been announced back in 1938 
> for ETs.  Was this a curve being used on commercial phonograph records 
> or a belated article on Orthocoustic?  
>   
>> I don't recall discussing this with Peter, but others he worked with
>>     
> on
>   
>> a wider level may know his sources. George Brock-Nannestad, possibly?
>>
>> Will
>>
>>   
>>     
> I agree.  George, have you seen anything in the EMI papers that discuss 
> this?
>
> Mike Biel   [log in to unmask] 
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Doug Pomeroy
>>
>> The following from Copeland's manual has always puzzled me, and I
>>     
> wonder
>   
>> if anyone can shed light on the reference to "Victor's then-unique  
>> use of multiple
>> limiters (essentially one on each mike)", since I've never heard of  
>> this from any other
>> source.  This may originate in Ref. 60, Wireless World (1941), which  
>> I have not
>> seen.  RCA Victor may have experimented with limiters in 1941, but  
>> Copeland's
>> statement can leave the impression that this was common practice.
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> 6.71 Various RCA characteristics
>>> Ref. 60 (July 1941) is the earliest contemporary reference I have  
>>> found which describes RCA Victor using pre-emphasis on its 78s,  
>>> although the time constant was not given. Straight listening  
>>> suggests the idea was tried somewhat earlier, and we saw in section  
>>> 6.23 that Moyer wrote about RCA's Western Electric systems with pre- 
>>> emphasis at 2500Hz (corresponding to 63.6 microseconds); but I am  
>>> deeply sceptical. It seems to me far more likely that, if something  
>>> which had been mastered direct-to-disc was reissued on microgroove,  
>>> the remastering engineer would simply have treated everything the  
>>> same. And I consider it likely that judging by "pure sound" clues,  
>>> Victor's then-unique use of multiple limiters (essentially one on  
>>> each mike), would itself have resulted in a "brighter" sound.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Doug Pomeroy
>>     
>
> **************************************************************************
>  
> Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
>  
> The British Library's new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2007/08 : www.bl.uk/knowledge
>  
> Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
>  
> The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
>  
> *************************************************************************
>  
> The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. 
>  
> The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. 
>  
> *************************************************************************
>
>   

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager