LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  October 2008

ARSCLIST October 2008

Subject:

Re: Aren't recordings original sources?

From:

Clark Johnsen <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:42:58 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (262 lines)

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Richard L. Hess
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> At 03:22 PM 2008-10-16, Clark Johnsen wrote:
>
> See, I can't quite decide what you dislike more, the price (admittedly
>> high)
>> or the very concept that a mere cord (!) could make more difference than
>> "a
>> transformer, or rectifier or
>> filter". There being no evidence offered, I'll just have to note that on
>> all
>> wide-range high-resolution audio systems I've ever heard, specialty power
>> cords have wrought major improvements. Granted that's just observational
>> data, but it's the only data so far.
>>
>
> Hello, Clark,
>
> Perhaps we shouldn't discuss audiophile products in this forum as most
> people in this forum have to struggle to find $1000 to spend on a Nakamichi
> Dragon, we don't need them to have the angst that they need to spend another
> $1000 on the power cord or they'll be missing something.


Knowledge = angst?

Hey, I can't afford $1500 either! But I want to know what's out there. (And
maybe talk someone else into trying it.)

Besides, I don't see such things as "products", but rather as techniques.
And stuff to discover.


> They will get far more improvement out of the purchase of a Nakamichi
> Dragon or a CR7 to play their cassettes than changing the power cord on
> their Sony cassette machine.


With all due respect, that's just an assertion -- the same as made by the
fellow at Wiki. Have you any observational evidence to back it up?

>
>
> I would like to have an engineering explanation of what makes a $500+ power
> cord worth more than the $20 one that is typically supplied with
> industrial-strength computer servers.


Get in line, pal! So would I. That said, over the years I have bothered to
acquaint myself with the literature available, but so far there is no "an
explanation", meaning one place you can go to learn all about it. Best
approach remains, trying something for yourself. If nothing happens, your
wallet remains intact.

>
>
> There are only a few electrical and mechanical properties that can be
> altered by the power cord. I think the following is a fairly complete list:
>  Electrical: Resistance, Capacitance, Inductance, Characteristic Impedance
> of the line, shielding, contact resistance at both ends.
>  Mechanical: can it withstand X number of insertion/withdrawal cycles and
> will it fall out in use?


Omitted in the above: Several E-M effects, nature and behavior of dielectric
insulation, vibration (both signal-induced and external), quality of
construction, solid or stranded (makes a difference), copper or...? Add to
those, the evanescent and perhaps unconquerable nature of problems in the AC
supply. There's more, but that's off the top of my head.

See? All that strange stuff going on... Not on your list...

>
>
> Considering the variability of the power wiring in the walls, the last six
> feet has only a limited opportunity to make any change to the sound of the
> component,


Correction: We're talking the *first* six feet here. That's what the gear
sees.


> and if a device is properly designed,


[Say the designers...]


> the minor parameter variations that typical differences in power cords
> present are far less than the variations in building wiring.


Again, an assertion. Sorry, but I'm not going to let you do the argument
from authority.

>
>
> I think that power cord ROUTING (which doesn't cost much -- a few dollars'
> worth of Velcro cable ties perhaps) is a far better place to spend one's
> effort than buying expensive power cords with insignificant measurable
> differences. Power cords can crosstalk into audio cables.


Now you're talking sense! Or, in other words, you've identified some further
contributors.

Back in the day... I was systems engineer aboard the Mars Lander Camera. Our
department was charged with just that: Identify all contributors to system
degradation. And make no assumptions, this is a tens-of-millions-of-dollars
project we have. Identify all! *Then* tell us what effect each one has, and
back that up please.

I've applied that sort of thinking to audio.

>
>
> Any equipment other than a power amplifier that sounds better due to a
> power cord's parameters is defective in design or current operation.


News flash: That's *every one *of them!


> The power supply should isolate the internal circuitry from variations in
> supply current far greater than that caused by differences in the power
> cable.


"Should"... that word...

>
>
> In an audio power amplifier, the above is also true with the exception that
> if the power cord is causing a reduction in voltage at the amplifier under
> load, then it should be replaced with a lower-loss one, which is typically
> available for $20 or so.


Goes without saying, I'd think.

>
>
> Since there are no published performance specifications for any of the
> cords that I have seen,


And listened to?  ;-)


> let's look at a worst-case scenario. If the "bad" power cord


Whoa! In the specialty field there are few if any outright "bad" ones. If
there were, the company would go under very quickly. Word gets around.


> has a total of one-ohm resistance (or let's even say impedance at 60 Hz),
> and you have a device drawing one amp, then this power cord will add a
> voltage drop of one volt which is less than 1% of the power line voltage.
> Typical voltage variations are +/- 5% in most areas, with some going down to
> -10% at high load times. In addition, in most industrial buildings, the
> maximum voltage drop in the feeders (2%) plus the branch circuits (3%) also
> adds up to 5%, so it's quite easy to see that the power SUPPLY can have
> perhaps a +5%/-10% variation and still be within specification. We hope it's
> better than that, but less than 1% from the power cord (and I suspect far
> less than that) should not make a difference.


"Should"... that word, again...

>
>
> And yes, in an era where we are facing a significant recession and possibly
> even a depression and in the era that is just past where we were flush with
> money but there were still homeless people on the streets of Canada and the
> U.S.A., I think it unconscionable that people would purchase these
> outrageously priced accessories with such a dubious improvement.


Ditto a $50 bottle of wine, when plonk gets you equally smashed? (Not to
mention that Ch. Petrus has opened at $1000 a bouteille... A scandal!)

Anyway the referenced Wiki article (the one without triangulation, where
this topic began) was written (poorly too) long before the current
economic difficulties.

>
>
> I also think it unconscionable that this amount of money is being spent on
> toys when similar quantities of funds could be sent to archives (and receive
> a tax break)


I have 40,000 78s. Anyone interested?

Thought not.

"Toys"? C'mon.

Anyway, who are you, sir, to dictate morally what is right, to the rest of
us?


> so they could preserve at-risk sound recordings of cultural and historic
> primary sources, despite the fact that primary sources aren't allowed on
> Wikipedia (for good reason, as I said).


Nor do I disagree.

>
>
> If you wish to spend your money on this and you have decided you can hear a
> difference, that's great,


Thank you.


> but I'd like you to think about the difference you hear and equate it with
> the homeless on the streets,


Again with the highhanded moralizing.


> or tapes which are rotting with no funds to transfer them.


I respect and actually do support efforts along those lines. I joined ARSC
in, let's see, 1978. (I had read about it in one of those detestable
specialty audio magazines.) Even gave a paper once, and set up a lengthy
demo at a convention. Plus I have conceived a grand (OK, grandiose) project
to do just what you're concerned about. In a way it's an end-run around
conventional thinking, exactly the way I try to practice audio.

For one view of "my own unique contribution", this on a topic very much of
interest to ARSC folk, see:

http://www.positive-feedback.com/Issue25/cjdiarires.htm

>
> Cheers,


Likawise,

clark

>
>
> Richard
>
>
> Richard L. Hess                   email: [log in to unmask]
> Aurora, Ontario, Canada       (905) 713 6733     1-877-TAPE-FIX
> Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
> Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager