Hi George; A little history. There were two competing stereo
systems, Crosby and GE Zenith. Crosby was much better than the GE
Zenith with stereo specs almost as good as mono FM. But Crosby was
not as good in mono compatibility and also it may not have allowed for
SCA service, then a money revenue for the stations. Lots of mono, and
no stereo receivers at the time. GE Zenith also had big money and
political connections so it won out over the technically better Crosby
stereo system. GE Zenith did have the pilot tone issues you mention,
along with more multipath distortions There had to be an audio
bandwidth filter used to cut the audio off above 16K HZ to protect the
19 K Hz pilot. Mono FM had wider bandwidth up to 20 KHZ, and a
simpler signal with no audio phase summing issues either acoustic or
the L + R and L - R stuff to mess it up. Also the 75 micro second
audio emphasis curve in broadcast and 75 de-emphasis curve in
receivers helped signal to noise a lot too. But when there were hot
high level high frequencies, over modulation was a concern. So we now
have a FM stereo degraded signal to noise situation due to the GE
Zenith compromise with the old FM mono receivers calling the technical
tune. Likewise when TV transitioned from Black and White to NTSC
Color. Black and White, when done with a live broadcast of a wide
bandwidth single tube camera, seen on a wide bandwidth B & W monitor
or off air monitor was stunning in its detail. When compromised NTSC
color came in we got dot crawl, scan line crosstalk, reduced
bandwidth, gray scale and color problems in dealing with three color
signals when seen on both black and white as well as standard color
TVs. When TV audio went from mono to stereo, it too was degraded in
signal to noise, but saved somewhat by the CBS CX stereo audio noise
reduction system, that was also used on 12 inch Laserdiscs.
Back to FM. Stereo FM signal to noise was not very good because of
the issues mentioned. In the early 1970s Dolby came on the scene with
their noise reduction systems. These were used in studio audio,
consumer B formats, and Dolby film improvements. Dolby also wanted to
improve FM stereo and came out with their model 334 Dolby B FM encoder
to clean up FM stereo noise issues. I was involved in getting the
first NPR FM station converted over to Dolby B FM. When everything
was done right it worked very well. We measured about 94 DB SN in
Stereo and 104 DB SN in mono FM. Rather impressive improved
performance, which could be made even better if one later switched
over to the newer and better Dolby C and Dolby S systems, that would
have made the SN about 10 DB better. Dolby FM failed in the
marketplace and the Dolby FM 334 system had to be taken out. Why the
failure? On the transmission side, there was more audible noise found
in the Modulator, STL Link, Audio Console, and music program sources
that compromised Dolby FM performance as the Dolby would show up their
noise shortcomings. Many stations would not change their other
equipment or level practices, but had to engage in the loudness wars
to keep listeners. The Dolby FM Encoder also changed the transmitter
pre-emphasis from 75 microseconds down to 25 microseconds which
technically was a good improvement to allow more high level high
frequency signals without over modulation violations. But FM
receivers also needed a switch to change their de-emphasis back and
forth from 75 microseconds for non Dolby stations to 25 microseconds
for Dolby Stations. One also had to line up signal levels to Dolby
standards and have a Dolby B decoder at the audio line output of the
tuner or the receiver. All this was all just too much for the general
public. Listeners did not usually hear programs of master tapes of
wide range classical music. Their taste was for other music types with
little dynamic range. Most did not have wide range hi-fi stereo
systems either, but instead listened on car radios and table top
radios. Dolby FM sounded worse to them with its lower modulation
levels and changed pre-emphasis. It sounded duller to them as a
result. There were no radio or tuners that would automatically and
simultaneously do three things. 1. Change the De-emphasis between 75
and 25 microseconds. 2. Turn the Dolby B decoder on and off, and 3.
align the signal levels for proper tracking of the tuner's Dolby
decoder to the Dolby FM station. When tuning to a non dolby station,
the above had to revert to the old standard FM settings. Many
listeners also thought loud was good and powerful. Some did have
reception problems that chronic high modulation levels and various
processing helped solve. Thus Dolby B FM stations lost listeners with
Dolby B FM, so they pulled the plug on it. Accordingly, it is hard to
actually improve FM on air broadcasting unless one can address and fix
all issues at the same time in a systematic way. The marketplace, bad
technical compromises, government, and consumers were just not willing
to do what it took to make things better for the long term good of FM
Broadcasting in a comprehensive rational orderly way. A familiar
story. Anyone want to go back to Crosby stereo or Dolby B or Dolby
S FM today? With new low noise quiet analog and digital radio
station program sources it would sound fantastic, but no one will
fight all the battles to do the job right as it must be done. Adding
Surround Sound would cause other headaches and problems. So over the
air FM is, by its
market place, standards, technicalities, and FCC rules, limited and
stuck where it is as to its sonic performance. Satellite, cable,
fiber, internet, etc get around FM broadcast's old obsolete standards
and limitations, so they largely take the market.
Hope this helps you. Charlie Richardson
On Oct 7, 2008, at 2:03 AM, George Brock-Nannestad wrote:
> From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
>
> Hi Folks, Bob Cham wrote:
>
> ............
>>
>> The problem lies with the multiplex system that we use. When FM went
>> STEREO, the FCC didn't want to obsolete all the mono receivers, as
>> they had when the band changed frequency. Thus we broadcast L+R
>> (mono), and L-R, which are combined to make stereo. It doesn't
>> exactly make for a robust stereo signal, but it is compatible.
>>
>
> .......................
>
> Isn't the problem that in stereo, the pilot tone (multiplied by two)
> is AM
> modulated by the L-R and not FM at all? This was the system that won
> out.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> George
|