You could try parsing it with an earlier version of Saxon, like 6.5.5 to
see if that will work for you.
Michele R Combs wrote:
> Yes, I know they are. I was just explaining why we updated our version
> of Saxon -- it was because the older version of Saxon that we had (it
> was VERY old!) required the JVM and our IT people don't like JVM due to
> security holes.
> The problem I'm having has nothing to do with JVM, you're right, it's
> clearly related to Saxon itself. As I said, somehow a portion of our
> style sheet is being disregarded by this current version of Saxon. Will
> simply changing my style sheet to 2.0 will fix my problem? It didn't
> seem so but maybe I missed something?
> Thanks --
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Encoded Archival Description List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Mark Carlson
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 4:27 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: EAD to HTML, Saxon, and meta tags
> JVM and Saxon are two separate things. There is no real benefit to
> using the new version of Saxon with as XSLT 1.0 stylesheet and the older
> versions of Saxon should still work with the new version of JVM. There
> are some speed improvements in Saxon after version 6.53, but other than
> that, the only real benefit is if you are parsing an XSLT 2.0