On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Laurence Creider wrote:

   J. Marr wrote:
>> AACR2 0.14 = "The examples ... are illustrative and not prescriptive",

> The example in this case is intended to be prescriptive.

   Sorry. I should have said: Your response is arbitrary, illogical and
contrary to the rule. Rules are not meant to be ignored arbitrarily,
interpreted illogically, or just plain
                                             John G. Marr
                                             Cataloger
                                             CDS, UL
                                             Univ. of New Mexico
                                             Albuquerque, NM 87131
                                             [log in to unmask]
                                             [log in to unmask]

         **"I really like to know the reasons for what I do!"**
                                             Martha Watson

Opinions belong exclusively to the individuals expressing them, but
sharing is permitted.