LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2008

ARSCLIST December 2008

Subject:

Re: Project 3 masters

From:

Mark Jenkins <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:28:42 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (136 lines)

Scott/Tom,

We actually represent the current owners of the Project 3 catalogue, SPJ
Music, for licensing.  We have not exploited this particular catalogue
as of yet (as our initial interest was in the Vox catalogue, which is
also owned by them).  I'm in the process of getting a list of the type
of masters in the archive still extant (multi-channel, 35mm, quad,
etc.).  Presently, the masters for these are in storage in
Massacheusetts.  I do not, as of yet, have a good handle on the
condition of these, but will update you when known.


Mark Jenkins
President, Licensing Division
Madacy Entertainment LP/Countdown Media
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Scott D. Smith
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 5:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] 35mm magnetic film as a music-master recording
method

Tom,

To the best of my knowledge, Command stopped using 35mm as a recording 
medium after Enoch Light sold the label to ABC Records in 1965. ABC then

sold it to MCA, who promptly relegated it to the trash heap of 
re-issues. A sad story...

Richard Gradone did a doctoral dissertation on the career of Enoch Light

and his record labels while at NYU in 1980. I have never read it, so I 
don't know if it might contain any pertinent information or not.

I have only a few Project 3 original releases. I know that "Patterns in 
Sound" series was done on 35mm, but after that, I'm really not sure. 
There is also the entire catalog of Project 3 quad releases, which I 
assume were probably done on 4 track tape, but could have been recorded 
on 35mm 4 track mag as well.

In general, the recordings that Enoch Light did under the Command label 
were considered by many to be both artistically and technically superior

to the Project 3 releases, which had arrangements which were tended to 
be less interesting than those that were done under the Command label. 
In general, they didn't sell as well as the Command releases did.

I have no idea what Essex is doing with the current catalog, or even 
where the masters are. My guess is that they are probably in about the 
same condition as the Everest masters.

The only other possible release I can think of might be the 1957 
(Stokowski) version of "Fantasia", release by Walt Disney under the 
Buena Vista label. Sadly, the original 1939 recording has been lost to 
time, having been recorded on 35mm nitrate film, and later transferred 
to 3 track magnetic film over a jury-rigged class A phone line 
arrangement in 1955. Despite this, Terry Porter managed to clean it up 
fairly well for the 1980 re-release.

There were also a number of other movie soundtracks which were done on 
35mm mag for film release, some which ran simultaneous session tapes. I 
know a few scoring mixers who worked in Hollywood during the early 
seventies. They have told me that practices varied from session to 
session. Some would run tape and film, others were done only on film 
(usually four track or six track), and later mixed to a 2 track tape 
master for album release. Since liner notes seldom contained these 
details, they are probably lost to time. Nearly every mixer I've spoken 
to has preferred the quality of the mag film masters over those done on 
tape. This is probably primarily due to the faster speed of the film 
(equivalent to 18 IPS), thicker oxide formulations, and wider track 
configuration (150 mil for 3 track, 100 mil for 6 track).

Nearly all the mag film that I have worked with from the mid-1950's 
through the late 60's has suffered from some degree of VS, some much 
more so than others. Even film that has been stored in decent vault 
conditions has suffered, primarily due to the fact that most of it has 
been stored in sealed film cans, which doesn't allow for venting of the 
film. Most of the films also suffer from various degrees of base warp, 
which makes for a difficult situation when it comes to maintaining 
film-to-head contact.

Scott D. Smith
*Chicago Audio Works, Inc.*

Tom Fine wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I'm cookin' up some research here and I figured I throw a few 
> questions out to the group. The topic: the use of 35mm mag-film as the

> main recording medium for music albums.
>
> 1. As far as I can tell, before Everest Records started using 35mm to 
> do classical music recording sessions, the only prior use of 35mm as 
> an album-recording or album-mastering medium was a few cases of 
> film-soundtrack albums where the LP master was cut right from the 35mm

> soundtrack magnetic master. I think RCA issued a few of these early in

> the LP era but I'm not positive those were from 35mm magnetic masters 
> (they might have been from optical masters from pre-magnetic film 
> days). Any specific pre-Everest titles would be most appreciated. 
> Everest's use of mag-film was circa 1959-60.
>
> 2. The mag-film trend was short-lived, I think. As far as I can tell, 
> by 1964 or so, only Command Records was still regularly making 35mm 
> mag-film masters for music albums. Any information on other labels 
> aside from Command and Project 3 regularly using 35mm as their 
> recording and mastering medium in the mid-60's would be appreciated. 
> The last Mercury Living Presence film sessions were 1963. Mercury's 
> pop Perfect Presence series ended in late 1961, if I recall correctly.
>
> 3. By the late 60's, I think only Enoch Light's Project 3 Records was 
> still regularly recording and/or mastering to 35mm. If anyone has 
> information different from this, I'd be most appreciative if they'd 
> share it. I think Project 3 continued to use 35mm regularly into the 
> early 70's, even creating 4-track quad masters. But I don't have any 
> specifics about that era and Project 3, so any additional information 
> is greatly appreciated.
>
> For those shy and/or discreet, please feel free to ping me off-list 
> and thank you in advnace.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Tom Fine
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
Access to this email by anyone other than the addressee is unauthorized.

****************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager