LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2008

ARSCLIST December 2008

Subject:

Re: Two questions about Deutsche Grammophon

From:

George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:23:30 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (114 lines)

From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad

Roger Kulp wrote:

> When did Brunswick stop issuing Deutsche Gramophon/Polydor classical 78s in
> the US ? Was it as late as 1938, when Columbia bought out American Record?
> Does anybody have a listing of all of those that Brunswick put out ?

----- I have no catalogues - someone will. The American Music Lover reviewed 
many records - it must be possible to see when they had no more Brunswick 
input of the DG/Polydor material. It seems to me that the matrix exchange 
agreement worked both ways, and that it was the GE light-ray system used by 
Brunswick that was for a time adopted by DG ca. 1927.

> 
> I have seen where DGG had to cede back the use of Nipper,as part of war
> reparations.Was this this the case.and is there a detailed account of this
> anywhere ?

Roger, this is complicated, but not really much more than the rest of the 
record industry. I shall give details that may be too much for you, but this 
way they will be set down for further reference. However, even more details 
have been left out!

The matter involves Polyphon Musikwerke AG so named in 1895, but founded on 
the basis of an earlier company Brachhausen & Riesener already existing in 
1887. 

It also involves Deutsche Grammophon Gesellschaft founded by the brothers 
Joseph (always in Germany) and Emile Berliner on 6 December 1898, converted 
into Deutsche Grammophon-Aktiengesellschaft on 27 June 1900, and the shares 
were shortly thereafter sold to the Gramophone & Typewriter Limited in 
London. It hence became a daugther company.

It also involves the International Zonophone Company (Frank Seaman's 
ungentlemanly creation) and the precautionary German trade mark registration 
of Zonophon by Deutsche Grammophon on 7 March 1900. Eldridge Johnson's 
intervention and US business details not brought here caused the creation of 
the German company International Zonophone Company m.b.H. on 28 November 
1904, and this company, wholly owned by Deutsche Grammophon, then became the 
registered Zonophon trade mark holder on 16 July 1906. It should be noted 
that in Germany a trade mark can only be sold if the business that owns it is 
sold in the same deal.

During WW1 Deutsche Grammophon and Polyphon and the rest of the companies 
(International Talking Machine Co (Lindström): Odeon, Beka, etc.) all 
coexisted, but on 24 April 1917 Deutsche Grammophon was confiscated as Alien 
property and sold to Polyphon Musikwerke AG, which subsequently changed its 
name to Polyphon-Werke AG. Despite Germany losing the war the property of the 
Gramophone Company was not returned (causing amongst other things the 
creation of the notorious Opera Disc Company records and the "dogless 
gramophone" that infringed VTMC's copyright in the US). 

A lot of material and rights reverted to the Gramophone Company in 1931 as a 
compromise obtained via the Mixed Arbitral Tribunal settlement, but the 
Nipper trademark remained as the Deutsche Grammophon trademark in Germany. 
One reason was undoubtedly that the German trade marks act stipulates that a 
trademark can only change owner with the business it relates to. I shall not 
go into the various dealings concerning DG, Telefunken, Siemens in the 1930s 
and '40s. However, it is important to note that in an agreement dated 5 July 
1949 Deutsche Grammophon accepted not to use the German trade mark any more 
and to give Electrola Gesellschaft m.b.H. an unlimited use license on 1 July 
1951. This company then re-filed applications for Nipper trademarks in 
Germany.

However, still today, Deutsche Grammophon have in their possession metals 
that "really" belong to the successors of the Gramophone Company, EMI, and 
because the Deutsche Grammophon was the matrixing and pressing plant in the 
acoustic period, these are frequently closer to the original wax surface than 
the metals held by EMI. Historic Masters Ltd. that licenses metals for vinyl 
re-issue has been so fortunate as to gain access to these metals for some of 
their prestiguous re-issues. Alfred Clark had tried to get the metals to 
England in 1917 by offering ingots of copper in return, but this was 
prevented by the war cabinet - they were afraid the copper would be used for 
German munitions.

Electrola is the last company/trade mark involved in this German story. When 
electrical recording became foreseeable, the Gramophone Company could not be 
without activities and sales in Germany, and they took advantage of the fact 
that the confiscation of 1917 had completely forgotten the International 
Zonophone Company m.b.H., which was inactive. In 1925 the owner, the 
Gramophone Company in London, re-activated this sleeping company and 
performed a name change into Electrola Gesellschaft m.b.H., and this company 
filed for registration of the trade mark Electrola for electrically recorded 
records on 24 December 1925. This quick action took the German market by 
complete surprise.

For the above condensed history I have drawn on facts from a delightful book 
by Franz Schorn, a trade mark specialist with Electrola and Lindström who 
started his career in 1959 and with access to surprisingly well-preserved 
files, despite two wars. The book is "Alte Schallplatten-Marken in 
Deutschland", Florian Noetzel Verlag, Wilhelmshaven 1988. Furthermore I have 
done my own company research at the EMI Music Archives in the early 1980s.

I have a few private comments on the above.

Deutsche Grammophon was no longer holder of the dog and gramophone trademark 
in Germany, but they still consider their founding date to be the date of the 
founding of the original Gramophone Company/Berliner enterprise in Germany!

I personally consider that the present Deutsche Grammophon (obviously now 
part of Polygram with Philips and Decca, rest their souls) has really raped 
history by claiming that it was founded in 1898 and celebrating that date. It 
was not - the company that was founded in 1898 was effectively stolen by 
Polyphon, and it is the founding date of Polyphon Musikwerke AG 1895 that is 
the correct founding date for the present company. However, that is not 
nearly as prestigious, because they manufactured musical boxes and not 
recorded music.

Best wishes,


George

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager