LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  January 2009

ARSCLIST January 2009

Subject:

Re: Digital oral history recorders - any recommendations?

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:57:48 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (37 lines)

For what it's worth, I've had good audio luck but so-so usability luck with the M-Audio Microtrack
II. Finally with the latest firmware, they seem to have solved a problem where it would randomly
fail during a recording, lock up and need a complete reboot. This is NOT good for a must-do field
recorder. So far, after installing the new firmware and turning DMA off (a new option in the SYSTEM
menu), no random failures. But I don't want to say the problem is solved until I've used it plenty.
The failure happened with a variety of make and model flash cards, as has been reported by other
users. From what I can tell, it may be power-supply based and not memory-card-interaction based,
which means turning off DMA may or may not help. For what I used the Microtrack for this is not a
problem but I did have it fail once while recording a live web stream and that was very annoying.

Given the wide variety of choices today, I would say you can probably find something comparably
priced that is more bulletproof. Whether it will have the same excellent audio quality is another
question. For oral history recording, to replace something pretty bulletproof like a
properly-functioning cassette recorder, I would shop for durability above audio, and would favor a
proven track record of durability over a new, easier-to-use but unproven device. If you find
excellent for both in your price range, you are golden.

My bottom line, as a person who reluctantly retired his Sony Pressman, digital portable recorders
offer vastly superior sound quality and I bet some of the newer models have been engineered for
improved reliability. But the Microtrack II is definitely more finicky and failure-prone than any
cassette recorder I ever owned. Also, in typical digital-device design MO, the buttons are too damn
small and too sensitive to the touch!

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message -----

> At 11:07 AM 2009-01-26, Schooley, John wrote:
>>We are looking to apply for a grant in order to purchase some digital
>>recorders for oral history interviews. Up until now we have been using
>>cassettes. I was curious if any of you have any experience with any
>>particular models, or any recommendations? Keep in mind that these
>>devices will probably be used by a variety of interviewers (historians,
>>volunteers, etc.), none of them audio engineers, so ease and simplicity
>>of use is probably the most important factor.
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager