LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  January 2009

EDUCAT January 2009

Subject:

Re: incorporating RDA into a Cataloging and Classification class

From:

Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:20:05 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (103 lines)

.."A corollary is that to give a proper orientation to the real knowledge
base of our profession as it is today, the master's degree should be a
two-year program. Not that that will happen; the *monetary return is so
small that I think many prospective students look long and skeptically at
the investment for even a one-year program."*
**

Reading these posts this morning, with some thoughts. Something to
understand also is that over time as you all know, everything changes and
esp. practice in libraries, of all different types: one person solo
operation, small academic v large academic libraries, public library systems
where cataloging is already done for small branches etc school libraries,
and also science and special research libraries--that is a tall order for us
to think about our graduate students exploring their future careers at this
point. If someone wishes to succeed in their future, it is an investment
for them. 1-2 years is not much imho for anyone interested in furthering
their career opportunities. If someone with a background in IT dreams of
making 6 figure salaries in a library, it is not going to happen the same
way, and that is no secret, however on the same topic, any one who wants to
move up in an academic library career should know across the board, they
will need a library/information science degree to advance.
This term I have several students with PhDs in other areas who are returning
to earn their degrees for futures in libraries/information organizations,
many J.D lawyers have also found new career opportunities in the field, and
to someone determined to advance, 1-2 years is really a small sacrifice of
time. I think it took me 3 years to complete my MLS at Albany, and I
worked full time, and commuted from NYC and Albany several hours a day
between work, school, and raising my family. How many years it takes
really should not be the main focus of one's future goals. just my two
cents this morning.....:-)

I'm actually amazed at some of the graduate students I see, juggling several
careers at once and continuing with school, it's not easy, however many are
doing it. A growing trend in the past year I have seen, is a growing number
of graduate students living in other countries, not just with military
families but students living over seas with other work etc, it's amazing to
me when I used to think a 3 hour commute was tough.

Best, Karen

Karen Weaver, MLS
Adjunct Instructor Cataloging & Classification
The iSchool at Drexel University
College of Information Science & Technology
Philadelphia PA
email: [log in to unmask]

Electronic Resources Statistician
Duquesne University, Gumberg Library
Pittsburgh PA
email: [log in to unmask]



On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Richard Stewart <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Suzanne and Karen, good points about keeping the terminology clear. It's
> actually quite a challenge to clarify the distinctions among, and the
> history of, all the different standards and protocols that intersect in
> modern cataloging. It makes my head hurt if I start thinking it through
> before the second cup of coffee.
>
> I have long thought that the cores of our curricula need to incorporate a
> longer and deeper look into the history, principles, and current practice of
> bibliographic control. A corollary is that to give a proper orientation to
> the real knowledge base of our profession as it is today, the master's
> degree should be a two-year program. Not that that will happen; the monetary
> return is so small that I think many prospective students look long and
> skeptically at the investment for even a one-year program.
>
> Richard A. Stewart
> Senior Cataloger
> Indian Trails Public Library District
> 355 South Schoenbeck Road
> Wheeling, Illinois 60090-4499
> USA
>
> Tel: 847-279-2214
> Fax: 847-4760
> [log in to unmask]
> htpp://www.itpld.lib.il.us
> >>> Karen Weaver <[log in to unmask]> 01/11/09 10:38 AM >>>
> Suzanne and all:
>
> ps personally , I have never used the word "code" for cataloging-metadata
> work . I'll have students with a programming background or hobby who like
> to compare it to other "coding" work and that is all fine if it works for
> them. Since library catalogs esp contain a large amount of what is now
> called "legacy" data , I'm a strong supporter of historical understanding
> and perspective--even of the catalog. ;-) more on what a challenge
> for some today to understand the need for "structure" without seeming too
> "legacy-like" (?) ...
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Suzanne Stauffer <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think it is important to distinguish among "codes," "coding" and
> > "standards." ...
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager