I find the following format works well for all 78s and LPs, too. For
how the data responds to queries, see an older version of the data on
DISMARC.
Mike Gray
*Combined* Number Date Initial Date Full Place Label Ensemble
Conductor Composer Work 78 / 45 Issue 78 Prefix / Suffix 78
matrix LP Number CD Number Artists Artist sort Conductor1 Producer
/ Engineer Notes Additional Dates / Notes Victor number
*58508* *1/22/1931* *
* *
* *Parlophone* *
* *
* *BACH, J.S.* *Partita No. 1 - Courante; Sarabande* *
* *
* *95597* *
* *
* *Jean Dennery, piano* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
*
Maurice Mengel wrote:
> maybe you want to have a look at the Dublin Core-based Dismarc profile
> (http://www.aitbiz.com/dismarc/ftpdata/manual/dmManual.r1v63.htm).
> While not a complete solution, i find it aims for a useful compromise
> between complexity and precision. And compliant with the OAI world.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> Maurice Mengel
> Music Archive
> Ethnological Museum
> National Museums in Berlin
> http://www.ilkar.de
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Steven C. Barr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "D P Ingram" <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>> Yep, certainly a lot more metadata is needed.
>>> And that sadly varies over format too :(
>>>
>>>
>> Also, keep in mind that there are at least TWO different forms
>> of 78-related databases! The first is the "catalog," which lists
>> the phonorecords in a collection...and thus refers to existing
>> copies of phonorecords, and will include fields such as "Condition"
>> and "Price Paid;" The second is the "discographic" database,
>> which will aspire to list ALL the phonorecords on one or more
>> specific labels (or of specific genres)! This latter does NOT refer
>> to specific copies of phonorecords. Note that several examples
>> of the former can be used in the compilation of the latter!
>>
>> Steven C. Barr
>>
>>
|