LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  May 2009

EDUCAT May 2009

Subject:

Re: Who do you pay attention to?

From:

Hope A Olson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 28 May 2009 18:28:53 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

First, thanks, Janet, for your contribution to the Ethics of Information Organization conference. When the podcast is available I'll send a message to eduCAT so everyone can hear it.

In regard to research, I think it's important to create a climate in our MLIS programs that encourages research. Our approach at UW-Milwaukee takes several different angles. First, our MLIS has a required research methods course. We also have three options for students to pursue research: an advanced research methods course at the MLIS level (separate from our doctoral courses), an independent research course, and the option to do a thesis. We have an annual student research day at which students report on their research and have recently established a student research poster day. In both cases we have a mix of undergrad, MLIS, and PhD students and fund distance education students whose presentations are accepted and rewarding publication. We have a small grant available for research expenses (such as incentives for people to answer surveys).

Specifically for cataloging and related areas we have recently established an Information Organization Research Group which includes faculty and students - practitioners are also welcome. Our first two meetings consisted primarily of faculty and students describing their current and contemplated projects, connecting with similar interests, and seeking input from the group on how to deal with problems they have encountered. Some MLIS students have been active in the group already. We even had one threesome of MLIS students do a research study that was not for a course or thesis - it was purely out of interest. That suggests to me that we are having some success in fostering an interest in research among our MLIS students, but it definitely requires work to create a positive research climate.

With ALCTS proclaiming 2010 as the year of cataloging research (although I didn't find it on their website) it's a good time to raise this issue. There are far more academic library catalogers than there are faculty who can contribute to our body of knowledge. The CCS research topics page http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/org/cat/research/index.cfm is a good beginning. A research agenda listing topics that are crying out for research would be a productive addition. Also, some further research training for catalogers and related professionals would make a good preconference - especially if the cost were subsidized. It could focus on methods especially useful to us - like transaction log analysis as well as questionnaires. Finally, presenting more existing research to classes and at conferences might encourage others to do research. We don't have a really good conference for presenting cataloging research. ALA is more "how-to" (also important) and discussion of standards than research. ASIST doesn't have much library content, although the Classification Research SIG usually includes at least some. Fortunately, we have CCQ and LRTS which both publish research (our information organization and ethics conference proceedings will be in a special issue of CCQ). So perhaps another way to encourage research is to make sure that students become accustomed to reading the research pieces in these publications.

I'll be interested to hear what works at other schools and any ideas for promoting 2010 as the year of cataloging research.

Hope

Hope A. Olson, Professor and Associate Dean
School of Information Studies
510G Bolton Hall
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Milwaukee, WI 53201
USA
http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/SOIS
email [log in to unmask]

----- "Janet Hill" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> From: "Janet Hill" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 5:09:59 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: [eduCAT] Who do you pay attention to?
>
> This may be somewhat off topic for a group devoted to cataloging
> education
> .... but not TOTALLY off topic.
> 
> I gave a paper last week, at a conference on The Ethics of
> Information
> Organization.  As best I could tell, registrants included lots of
> students,
> lots of LIS educators, and not-quite-so-many practitioners, although
> it was
> a pretty good mix. At the reception on the first evening, I fell into
> conversation with one of the LIS educators, and we drew a number of
> threads
> from the day together, as he said something to this effect:
> 
> <<I suddenly realized that in LIS schools, we lavish a lot of time
> individually mentoring our PhD students in research (how to frame a
> question, how to choose a method, how to follow up, how to target a
> publishing venue, reviewing drafts, etc.) but our MLS students get
> maybe a
> research methods class and a few projects to complete.  And all the
> while,
> it is the practitioners who make up most of the profession, and who
> will
> conduct most of the research, and publish most of the papers, and if
> they
> are in academic libraries, they'll HAVE to do research and
> publication.  And
> the same thing is true of preparing for or planning a career -- we
> mentor
> the PhD students intensively, but the masters students not nearly so
> much.>>
> 
> And reflecting on that conversation, it brought to mind many previous
> conversations and thoughts from over the years.  That although ALA
> accredits
> the masters programs, the schools that offer PhDs may define
> themselves or
> assess their worth based on the PhDs, or the faculty may have greater
> affinity for the PhD students, since overwhelmingly that is their
> background.
> 
> Well ..... practicing catalogers and technical services managers (and
> all)
> have to do research and investigation and inquiry in real life, and
> many are
> required to publish.  And the profession and discipline grow through
> contributions of those in the profession -- most of whom have the
> terminal
> professional degree.  
> 
> What's the balance?  Do you prepare catalogers (and their ilk) for
> the
> possibility and necessity of research and publication, and for
> conducting
> it?  Do schools that have both masters and PhD programs define
> themselves
> too much in terms of their successes in PhD "production" and overlook
> the
> real needs of practitioners for knowing how to do research, for
> understanding an obligation to contribute to the knowledge of the
> field
> through inquiry and publication?
> 
> I'd be interested in your reactions, contradictions, information,
> verification, whatever.
> 
> 
> Janet Swan Hill, Professor
> Associate Director for Technical Services
> University of Colorado Libraries, CB184
> Boulder, CO 80309
> [log in to unmask]
>      *****
> "For we are catalogers, and therefore the elect of God.  To read is
> human;
> to catalog, divine."  Charity Blackstock.  Dewey Death.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager