... And it would be interesting to establish how many of these
supposed "Hollywood" developments were kick-started by the
early-1930s technical and artistic diaspora from Berlin studios such
as UFA, where, say, lip-synching to a backing track for musical
numbers was fully in place by 1931.
Tony B
On 25 Jun 2009, at 1:04, Tom Fine wrote:
> What they were doing in Hollywood, from the early days, was
> recording different aspects of the final soundtrack on different
> bits of film and then mixing together from motor-sync'd playback to
> a final sound master. There were crude mixing consoles from early
> in the electronic recording days, too. One specific example I was
> told about, and I'll ask the guy for the film title because I don't
> remember it, was the final music was mixed from three optical
> elements, one made from each microphone, with each microphone
> focused on a different musician or group of musicians. This would
> be very similar to live-in-the-studio multi-tracking. They were
> also able to pre-record music tracks very early, so a singer on
> film would be singing against a playback. And lip-sync'ing and
> indeed orchestra play-sync'ing were developed early on, too. By the
> early 1930's, Western Electric (and probably others) had developed
> amplifier and mixer-network systems allowing for mixing many
> different sound elements into a final soundtrack. Also, the whole
> idea of "stem" mixes came out of Hollywood, a way to reduce many
> elements to a few logically organized stems for final mixdown. By
> the 1940s, the major studios' sound departments had big 3-person
> consoles for final mixing (dialog, music, sound effects). Those
> guys were aces, too. Think of the mono soundtracks for some of the
> big musical pictures, that's a very complex sound universe to fit
> into one channel.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
>
|