LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2009

ARSCLIST June 2009

Subject:

Re: New LoC Recording Registry

From:

Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:35:54 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (217 lines)

From: Vincent Pelote <[log in to unmask]>
> Doesn't it make sense then that a music as culturally,
> historically and aesthetically important as jazz (often
> called "America's classical music") should be heavily
> represented in a National Recording Registry? 

Actually I see the list as coming in bunches.  Some eras have a lot of
jazz to the exclusion of other genre of recordings, while other eras are
heavy in spoken word, or rock, or classical to the exclusion of jazz. 
The registry is a work-in-progress, and the annual lists need to be
looked at in context of the full list, and that full list sometimes gets
out of balance as some genres play catch up.  I wonder if there has been
a chart made of the genres and their timelines to make comparisons of
imbalance. That might make a good project, but it is something that
should have already been in place for the committee to use in their
considerations.  If it is, it would be good to make public.  If not, it
could be something to submit to some of the people we know on the
committee.

The other problem I wonder about are the annotations on each recording. 
There should be a lengthy file on each recording, but I find no way of
viewing these on-line.  Are these files available at LC?  Or do they
even exist???  Some of these recordings are things that I have done
detailed research on, such as the Defense Test Day, the Hindenburg
disaster, Rachmaninoff's 2nd Piano Concerto, Richard Hale/Kousy Peter
and the Wolf, FDR Declaration of War, and a number of others.  Does the
FDR file explain the various ways the different networks broadcast the
House debate that followed, and do they include these different
recordings?  The House debate portions are MORE IMPORTANT than FDR's
speech is, and my recordings are the most complete available and I
donated dube to both NARA and LC.  The description of the Rach 2
mentions that two movements had been released in an acoustical version,
but doesn't mention that the entire concerto had been recorded
acoustically and that the missing last side of the 1st mvt has been
found.  Do they have the info I discovered about the forged ledger sheet
which changed the approved takes to reflect the alternate takes they
started using in the early war years?  Do they have all the issued
alternate takes?  Do they also have the unissued alternate takes I know
are still in the vaults?  Likewise with the Peter and the Wolf, do they
have the issued and unissued alternate takes?  Do they know that the
piece was recorded straight thru on one take and then they went back and
recorded a couple of re-takes of each side later in the session?  Have
they put together the take-ones in a separate sequence to re-create that
unique recording session?  Or have they never even looked at the session
sheet?  

While there is a mechanism in place to put in nominations, I see no
mechanism to update, supplement and correct the information of the
recordings already in the registry.  The public info doesn't even give
any discographical info, or even any finding aid info, although the
annual lists give the identification of the photographs and their
finding numbers in the listings but not the recordings themselves.

   

> Why is it that other countries (France, Denmark, Japan, etc.)
> revere jazz more than the land where it was created?
> Vincent Pelote


If you look at the TV ratings you can understand that the American
people in general are dunderheads.  The Europeans in general revere
*ALL* culture more than the American people.  The European interest in
Jazz is of long standing, back to the 1930s and even earlier (as Rainer
Lotz's ARSC presentation showed) but the damn fool U.S. copyright law,
coupled with the damn fools who run the U.S. record companies have made
it almost impossible for any general interest in jazz to now develop in
the American people.  

You know what I found out yesterday?  A college chum of mine is
president of the Philadelphia Broadcast Pioneers.  He wanted to put
recordings of some compositions written by members of the group on their
web page when they did recent tributes to these composers.  They
received a notice from ASCAP of enormous fees due.  They had a signed
agreement from the composer of the music allowing them to use it but
ASCAP told them that the composer was not allowed to go around his ASCAP
agreement.  When a BMI composer was next to be honored, my friend told
him to go to BMI himself, and BMI told him the same thing that ASCAP had
told the assoc in the earlier case.  I suggested that the public
performance licensing agencies did not have EXCLUSIVE rights, that the
Commercial advertising rights are reserved to the creators, and that
they could claim these are commercial advertising usages, but their
lawyers said that ASCAP and BMI might sue anyway even though they know
they will lose, and that it would still cost plenty.  

So the organizations that are supposed to promote the use of their
members' compositions and provide them income are BLOCKING usages that
are even authorized by the composers themselves.  That is similar to the
actions of the record companies that are not maintaining recordings in
print so that the composers and performers can continue to receive
royalties.  The copyright law is reducing, rather than increasing, the
income of the majority of composers and performers.  

Mike Biel [log in to unmask]  






Tom Fine wrote:
> The Command records, specifically "Persuasive Percussion," 
> "Provacative Percussion," "Big Band Bossa Nova," and "Stereo/35mm" all 
> charted, in fact Persuasive was at the top of the Billboard stereo 
> album charts for weeks and weeks. I know for a fact that "Persuasive" 
> and "Provacative" together sold over 1 million records, and the 
> briefly-available CD reissues sell for dozens of dollars used. These 
> were immensely popular records in their time, and were very important 
> to the industry as far as getting stereo established with the 
> listening public, the Regular Joes.
>
> I don't know about 1000 Strings, but I think Esquavel sold quite well, 
> too. After the massive success of Command, all the major labels tried 
> doing percussion and "stereo spectacular" records. Some sold quite 
> well, many were expensive flops, some are better remembered today than 
> they were accepted by the public when released.
>
> Also not on the list but deserving to be there are the only two 
> classical Gold Records from the 1950's -- the Mercury mono "1812 
> Overture" (Dorati/Minneapolis) and Van Cliburn's "victory lap" 
> recording after he won the Moscow competition, on RCA. I believe in 
> those days, Gold meant half a million or more in sales dollars, not 
> 500,000 units.
>
> I hesitate to suggest this, but ... if you're making a registry that's 
> truly representative of Americans' recording and listening tastes, 
> then you need to include something disco from the mid-70's. I'd 
> suggest that the soundtrack to "Saturday Night Fever," which I think 
> went mulit-platinum, would cover that.
>
> I'm not sure how the nominating process works, but this list is very 
> jazz heavy. Just to be clear, I love jazz and have a huge collection 
> of jazz albums and listen to jazz more frequently than any other type 
> of music, but, it was never what paid the bills for the music 
> business, at least not from the dawn of LPs forward. It was a freak 
> occurance for a jazz album to be a mainstream hit, and those albums do 
> belong on the list, stuff like "Kind of Blue," and "The Girl from 
> Ipanema." I don't have a beef with deep-catalog jazz on the list, I 
> just wish other stuff that had a much wider influence on the listening 
> public were on the list.
>
> Oh, one other thing that belongs on the list if you're including 
> important audio documents. Mickey Kapp made a 6-LP deluxe set for 
> Time-Life called "To The Moon" that summed up the space program 
> through the first moon landing and included extensive NASA and other 
> audio. It was more general and more all-encompassing than any other 
> space-related recording and apparently sold many copies based on how 
> many used and well-worn copies show up on eBay and in record shops 
> I've visited.
>
> It was nice to see O. Winston Link's train recordings listed, but what 
> about Emory Cook's, which were ground-breaking? I think Link's are 
> much cooler, but Cook was there first.
>
> Mike, definitely agree about Sound in the Round, although I'm not sure 
> how many copies of this sold to a mass audience. I know it came out on 
> stereo LP (I have a mint copy), but I think it got its big bang in the 
> early 2T tape days, so that was a niche if highly enthusiastic audience.
>
> BTW, I'm not convinced the folks who write copy for this list are even 
> clear that stereo happened before 1958!
>
> Ya know, the thought also occurred to me that Latin music is 
> under-represented, big-time! Anything from the Rhumba, Samba, Cha-Cha 
> records of the 1940s to Machito to Latin funk to more modern 
> pop-oriented Latin music like Ricky Martin (multi-platinum stuff, 
> should not be ignored even if it's not a typical collector's taste). 
> Aaron Levinson might chime in here, he's the true Latin expert on this 
> list.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Biel" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] New LoC Recording Registry
>
>
> From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
>> Also, no early stereo pop stuff, which sold millions and millions of 
>> records.
>
> Tom, you would have LOVED the presentation Dennis Rooney gave at ARSC
> last week about 1959: the first full year of the stereo disc. It was so
> evocative of my experiences in hi-fi that year I hit 13 and bought my
> first component system (as partially just discussed in the prior posting
> about getting my first tape recorder.) I was so glad my daughter was
> sitting there next to me to hear it, especially since we had gone thru
> the catalogs of 58 and 59 last year for a project she was doing. Of
> course now I have to go thru the pre-recorded tape catalogs of those
> years to figure out the prior question, but those catalogs are several
> hundred miles away right now.
>
> I assume that you mean things like the Command Persuasive/Provacative
> Percussion series, the Somerset 101 Strings series, Bob Schory,
> Esquavel, and Sounds Your Eyes Can Follow on RCA, etc. but there are a
> fair amount of early stereo stuff from the 58-61 years like (1958) Dance
> Mania. Tito Puente; Winds in Hi-Fi. Eastman Wind Ensemble with Frederick
> Fennell; "Poeme Electronique." Edgard Varese; (1959)Time Out. The Dave
> Brubeck Quartet; Mingus Ah-Um. Charles Mingus; Giant Steps. John
> Coltrane; Kind of Blue. Miles Davis, John Coltrane, Cannonball Adderley,
> Bill Evans, and others; "What'd I Say," parts 1 and 2. Ray Charles;
> (1960) Drums of Passion. Michael Babatunde Olatunji; and (1961) Judy at
> Carnegie Hall. Judy Garland.
>
> We should nominate Sound in the Round, Music for Non-Thinkers, Music for
> Bang Barooom and Harp, Delirium in Hi-Fi, Bob and Ray on A Platter,
> Cartoons In Stereo, etc etc. I've been meaning to do these and a bunch
> of other things but I never get around to it. You can put nominations
> in year-round. They did The Churkendoose this year (one of my
> favorites), and I've got a bunch of other kids records that also need to
> be nominated. I resolve to do it, and all you other complainers, get
> off your duffs (or stay on your duffs in front of the computer) and
> nominate what you favor.
>
> Mike Biel [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager