LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for METS Archives


METS Archives

METS Archives


METS@C4VLPLISTSERV01.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

METS Home

METS Home

METS  August 2009

METS August 2009

Subject:

Your help needed with a NISO survey

From:

Rhonda Marker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:00:09 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (51 lines)

Posted on behalf of the NISO I2 Library Workflows Scenario Group

NISO has identified the need for an institutional identifier to enable 
information transactions among uniquely identified entities across the 
Web. The NISO Institutional Identifier (I2) working group has been 
established to develop a robust, scalable and interoperable standard for 
identifying the institution--a core entity in any information transaction.

Institutions create, purchase, share and establish the provenance and 
authority of information for their users. Libraries and archives have 
been among the earliest adopters of institutional identifiers, from the 
published union catalog of library cards with NUC identifiers to 
interlibrary lending using the MARC code list for Organizations. These 
identifiers have reached their limits in terms of extensibility, scale 
and uniqueness. As non-actionable identifiers, they lack the currency 
and functionality to support information management in the global web 
environment.

This identifier strategy must work in the global information space and 
support the business model and needs of all the stakeholders—commercial 
information and service providers, institutions, creators, rights 
holders and users. It must integrate smoothly with existing workflows 
and processes and enable future workflows within the information chain.


Libraries and archives are major participants in global information 
sharing and have critical needs for institutional identifiers within 
their own organizations, for consortial activities and to share 
information with other institutions and their users worldwide. Legacy 
identifiers are embedded in most core library workflows. Understanding 
and supporting the needs of libraries is critical for the development of 
an institutional identifier strategy that is robust and useful for the 
long term.

Please assist us by taking part in a brief survey about the use of 
institutional identifiers in libraries. More than individual can 
contribute from a library since the use of identifiers differs across 
library workflow areas. The survey consists of 11 questions that are 
largely multiple choice and takes about 15 minutes to complete.

Thank you for your assistance with this effort. Your participation is 
important to us.

PLEASE ACCESS THE SURVEY HERE: http://bit.ly/qyKaZ


Thank you!

Grace Agnew
Co-Chair, NISO I2 Working Group

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
April 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
January 2017
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
January 2016
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
January 2014
December 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager