LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for MODS Archives


MODS Archives

MODS Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MODS Home

MODS Home

MODS  August 2009

MODS August 2009

Subject:

Re: MODS-MARC map: note type=bibliography

From:

Tracy Neckar Meehleib <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Metadata Object Description Schema List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:45:41 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (78 lines)

Hi Jane,

The existing MODS-MARC mapping and conversion is based on the MODS 3.0. We are currently in the process of drafting the MODS-MARC mapping and conversion for MODS 3.3.

I know that the 662/752 issue is addressed in the new mapping. And, at first glance, it looks like MODS notes that are typed "bibliography", based on the current MODS notes list <http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-notes.html>, will be converted to MARC 504 notes, once the MODS-MARC mapping and conversion for MODS 3.3 are complete.

Tracy


Tracy Meehleib
Network Development & MARC Standards Office
Library of Congress, LA-308
101 Independence Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20540-4402
(202)707-0121
[log in to unmask]

>>> Jane Otto <[log in to unmask]> 8/12/2009 9:28 AM >>>
In the MODS-MARC map, <note> with type=bibliography maps, like most
other notes, to 500. However, in the MARC format, a bibliography note
is tagged 504.

We are using LC's conversion tools and would like all our bibliography
notes to map to 504, whether they're mapped in from MODS or input
manually through our ILS.

Am I missing something, or is this something that could be revised in
the MODS-MARC map and the conversion tool?

Thanks again!

Jane

On 8/12/2009 9:20 AM, Jane Otto wrote:
> In the MODS-MARC map, <subject><hierarchicalGeographic> maps to 752.
> However, in the MARC format, 752 is meant for an "added entry [NOTE:
> not subject heading] in which the entry element is a hierarchical form
> of place name that is related to a particular attribute of the
> described item, e.g., the place of publication for a rare book."
>
> Shouldn't <subject><hierarchicalGeographic> map instead to 662,
> "Hierarchical form of a geographic name used as a subject added entry"?
>
> We are using LC's conversion tools but would like our subjects to map
> to 6xx, not 7xx.
>
> It looks like 662 might be a relatively new addition to the MARC
> format and so I'm wondering if this is just an oversight?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Jane Otto
> E-Monographs and Multimedia Metadata Librarian
> Rutgers University Libraries
>
> [log in to unmask]
> (732) 445-5904
> (732) 445-5888 (fax)
> Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
> Library Technical Services Building
> 47 Davidson Road
> Piscataway, NJ 08854-5603
>
>

--
Jane Otto
E-Monographs and Multimedia Metadata Librarian
Rutgers University Libraries

[log in to unmask]
(732) 445-5904
(732) 445-5888 (fax)
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
Library Technical Services Building
47 Davidson Road
Piscataway, NJ 08854-5603

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager