LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  October 2009

ARSCLIST October 2009

Subject:

Re: late date 78

From:

Roger Kulp <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:43:15 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (73 lines)

Again,let me bring up the Deutsce Gramophon microgroove 78s rom 1950,'51 or so. Anybody care to discuss these ?

                                        Roger



--- On Wed, 10/14/09, George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] late date 78
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 6:37 PM

From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad

Hello, Milan Milovanovic asked:
> 
> Speaking of micro versus wider grooves, would wider grooved cut record be 
> more resistant to micro scratches and easier to get clean from dust etc. 
> than "microgrooved" LP record?
> 
> Also, would 78 rpm speed be more suitable for recording/reproducing 
> especially at the last 1/5 of disc with no groove distortion added in this
> area (often connected to ordinary 33 rpm records)?
> 

> > Hello,
> >
> > Mike Biel wrote:
> >
> >> Theoretically the best sound at 78 would be with a microgroove size
> >> groove since it would be capable of higher frequency response than a
> >> wide groove, or a microgroove at slower speeds.
> >
> >
> > ----- now, I am speculating why this should be so. I do not understand why
> > a
> > microgroove should give a higher frequency response than a NORMAL groove.
> > It
> > has to do with the maximum acceleration of the tip and the ability of the
> > tip
> > to trace precisely the groove shape. If the smaller radius of an 
> > elliptical
> > stylus (or the radius of the edge in a line contact stylus) is able to 
> > trace
> > without error a curve in one flank of the groove, it does not matter
> where
> > the other flank of the groove is.
> >
> > If microgroove is associated with a higher groove pitch (which would
> mean
> > well above 200 grooves per inch), then the maximum amplitude would be 
> > reduced
> > compared to the ca. 100 grooves per inch in a traditional 78 rpm record.
> > If
> > we maintain the 100 grooves per inch but reduce the groove width and 
> > depth,
> > we would have more land to use, and the modulation could be higher,
> which
> > would give a low frequency advantage. That is the rationale behind disco
> > singles (albeit at 45 rpm). And all of this without variable groove pitch.
> > If
> > that is used, then we are even better of, bass-wise.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> > George 



      

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager