Hi Peter--
Is it OK if the LC response was a little later than this week? I really needed to get the input of catalogers, but we always reserve September for "production only month" and I'm not allowed to pull catalogers into meetings during that month. We'll be meeting tomorrow to collect comments, but it will take me a bit to synthesize and present to Barbara, et al., before sending. Hope this doesn't cause a problem for the timeline.
Dave
>>> "Fletcher, Peter" <[log in to unmask]> 9/9/2009 11:58 AM >>>
All, Les Hawkins has posted our preliminary report. An announcement
should be sent out soon to PCC lists.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:44 AM
To: Fletcher, Peter
Cc: Schuitema, Joan
Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised; PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
Peter, Joan the report is
posted:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/scs/Non-Latin-TF-Prelim-Report-Guidelines.
pdf
-- Joan, do you want to send out an announcement to the PCC email
lists? --Les
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
> Thanks very much Les,
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:38 AM
> To: Fletcher, Peter
> Cc: Schuitema, Joan
> Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised;
PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
>
>
> Ok, I have submitted the PDF to our quality assurance people here and
> will let you know next week when they approve, after that one of
> you? can send the url out saying the document is available for
> comment.
>
> Sorry for the delay. The PCC web site is undergoing revision, we are
> being
> asked to submit new pages for QA before we announce them (usually I
kind
> of do it simultaneously and I imagine I could still do this if there
is
> a
> real time pinch) --Les
>
>
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
>
> > Yes, sounds great. Also, I asked Sharon Benamou, our Judaica Catalog
> > Librarian to join the group, since we need another Hebrew/Yiddish
> > expert, and our only expert, Caroline Miller has had new duties
thrust
> > upon her here at UCLA with a grant project and doesn't have the time
> to
> > be as involved as she wants. She will remain on the task force,
> however.
> > Sharon is also here at UCLA. She has agreed to join and I introduced
> her
> > to the group. I added her name to the roster which is on the updated
> > report I just sent to Les along with the other documents.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schuitema, Joan [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 7:32 AM
> > To: Les Hawkins
> > Cc: Fletcher, Peter; Joan Schuitema
> > Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised;
> PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> >
> > I agree...a month is good. Easy to remember, etc. And while we
want
> to
> > stay on track as much as possible, this is not as time-sensitive an
> > issue
> > as some have been. And the group will still be working even during
> the
> > comment period. Ok with you Peter? --js
> >
> > On Wed, September 2, 2009 8:18 am, Les Hawkins wrote:
> > > I think a month is better-- would Oct. 7 work or would that cause
> > other
> > > problems? --Les
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
> > >
> > >> Les, Joan,
> > >>
> > >> I was thinking that a month would be enough for comments. Perhaps
> we
> > can
> > >> extend the deadline by a week. Or, would three weeks be
sufficient
> > for
> > >> comments?
> > >>
> > >> Peter
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:27 PM
> > >> To: Fletcher, Peter
> > >> Cc: Joan Schuitema
> > >> Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised;
> > PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >>
> > >> Peter, Joan, is this how it should be packaged and posted to the
> PCC
> > web
> > >> site? I am sorry I didn't mention this earlier, we will need to
> give
> > our
> > >> web 508 accessibility team about a week to give us the ok for
> > posting-
> > >> does that mess up the timing for getting comments? --Les
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Les, I attached a cover sheet as we discussed, and a slightly
> > revised
> > >> > report. I also attached the draft guidelines again just so that
> you
> > >> > have all three latest documents together for ease of use.
> > >> >
> > >> > Let me know if the cover sheet, report, and guidelines make
sense
> > now
> > >> > as a package.
> > >> >
> > >> > best, Peter
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 7:03 AM
> > >> > To: Joan Schuitema
> > >> > Cc: Fletcher, Peter
> > >> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Revised;
> > >> > PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >> >
> > >> > Joan, Peter, Thanks. Yes this will be fine if Peter gives me
this
> > >> > information directly. It will be good to have a listing of the
> > >> > membership-
> > >> > right now the charge doesn't list members. --Les
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Joan Schuitema wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Les,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Peter found a correction he had to make in the original
> doc...so,
> > >> > > he's
> > >> >
> > >> > > attached a clean copy. From what you did with the first
> version,
> > >> > looks
> > >> > > like the PDF comes out fine.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Peter will be naming one additional member to the
group....and
> > would
> > >> > like
> > >> > > the roster on the charge updated.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I've asked Peter to prepare a short cover page to be posted
> with
> > the
> > >>
> > >> > > 2
> > >> > docs
> > >> > > he's already sent that will include the following:
> > >> > > 1) Explains that this is an interim report and not yet
finished
> > >> > > 2) Briefly explains what the 2 documents are
> > >> > > 3) Identifies specific questions/areas the task group would
> like
> > to
> > >> > receive
> > >> > > input on
> > >> > > 4) a deadline for comments
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I've also asked him to correspond with you directly about
this.
> > Let
> > >> > me
> > >> > > know if that's ok with you. I've tried a few times this
> > afternoon
> > >> > > to
> > >> > phone
> > >> > > and ask if this was ok, but you've been away from your desk.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks for all your help with this and have a good weekend!
> --js
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >Delivered-To: [log in to unmask]
> > >> > > >Subject: Revised;
PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >> > > >Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:13:19 -0700
> > >> > > >X-MS-Has-Attach:
> > >> > > >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> > >> > > >Thread-Topic: Revised;
> > PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >> > > >Thread-Index: AconY5V3klo0scfyQrWZp/DDkvUPbg==
> > >> > > >From: "Fletcher, Peter" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> > > >To: "Joan Schuitema" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> > > >X-UIC-Note: Already SA Checked - Bypassed: Too Big
> > >> > > >X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 128.248.155.57
> > >> > > >X-Spam-Status: unchecked - too big.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Joan, I had to correct and replace the Yiddish example on p.
3
> > of
> > >> > this
> > >> > > >draft. It had an incorrect transliteration. The other
examples
> > >> > > >should
> > >> > be
> > >> > > >ok. Sorry about that.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Also, the task force intends to fill in the special rules
> > sections
> > >> > (the
> > >> > > >incomplete sections), but that is also partly dependent on
the
> > >> > feedback we
> > >> > > >get from PCC on whether or not to allow exceptions to for
> > headings
> > >> > for
> > >> > > >some languages such as the right to left languages. I think
> Les
> > >> > mentioned
> > >> > > >something about wanting PCC to fill those in, but that is
not
> > our
> > >> > intent.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Peter
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|