LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  October 2009

PCCTG1 October 2009

Subject:

Re: FW: Fwd: Revised; PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc

From:

David W Reser <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:42:59 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (263 lines)

Hi Peter--
Is it OK if the LC response was a little later than this week?  I really needed to get the input of catalogers, but we always reserve September for "production only month" and I'm not allowed to pull catalogers into meetings during that month. We'll be meeting tomorrow to collect comments, but it will take me a bit to synthesize and present to Barbara, et al., before sending.  Hope this doesn't cause a problem for the timeline.

Dave

>>> "Fletcher, Peter" <[log in to unmask]> 9/9/2009 11:58 AM >>>
All, Les Hawkins has posted our preliminary report. An announcement
should be sent out soon to PCC lists. 

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:44 AM
To: Fletcher, Peter
Cc: Schuitema, Joan
Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised; PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc


Peter, Joan the report is
posted:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/scs/Non-Latin-TF-Prelim-Report-Guidelines.
pdf
-- Joan, do you want to send out an announcement to the PCC email
lists? --Les


On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:

> Thanks very much Les, 
> Peter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 11:38 AM
> To: Fletcher, Peter
> Cc: Schuitema, Joan
> Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised;
PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> 
> 
> Ok, I have submitted the PDF to our quality assurance people here and
> will let you know next week when they approve, after that one of
> you? can send the url out saying the document is available for
> comment.
> 
> Sorry for the delay. The PCC web site is undergoing revision, we are
> being
> asked to submit new pages for QA before we announce them (usually I
kind
> of do it simultaneously and I imagine I could still do this if there
is
> a
> real time pinch) --Les
> 
> 
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
> 
> > Yes, sounds great. Also, I asked Sharon Benamou, our Judaica Catalog
> > Librarian to join the group, since we need another Hebrew/Yiddish
> > expert, and our only expert, Caroline Miller has had new duties
thrust
> > upon her here at UCLA with a grant project and doesn't have the time
> to
> > be as involved as she wants. She will remain on the task force,
> however.
> > Sharon is also here at UCLA. She has agreed to join and I introduced
> her
> > to the group. I added her name to the roster which is on the updated
> > report I just sent to Les along with the other documents. 
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schuitema, Joan [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 7:32 AM
> > To: Les Hawkins
> > Cc: Fletcher, Peter; Joan Schuitema
> > Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised;
> PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > 
> > I agree...a month is good.  Easy to remember, etc.  And while we
want
> to
> > stay on track as much as possible, this is not as time-sensitive an
> > issue
> > as some have been.  And the group will still be working even during
> the
> > comment period.  Ok with you Peter?  --js
> > 
> > On Wed, September 2, 2009 8:18 am, Les Hawkins wrote:
> > > I think a month is better-- would Oct. 7 work or would that cause
> > other
> > > problems? --Les
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
> > >
> > >> Les, Joan,
> > >>
> > >> I was thinking that a month would be enough for comments. Perhaps
> we
> > can
> > >> extend the deadline by a week. Or, would three weeks be
sufficient
> > for
> > >> comments?
> > >>
> > >> Peter
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:27 PM
> > >> To: Fletcher, Peter
> > >> Cc: Joan Schuitema
> > >> Subject: RE: Fwd: Revised;
> > PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >>
> > >> Peter, Joan, is this how it should be packaged and posted to the
> PCC
> > web
> > >> site? I am sorry I didn't mention this earlier, we will need to
> give
> > our
> > >> web 508 accessibility team about a week to give us the ok for
> > posting-
> > >> does that mess up the timing for getting comments? --Les
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Fletcher, Peter wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Les, I attached a cover sheet as we discussed, and a slightly
> > revised
> > >> > report. I also attached the draft guidelines again just so that
> you
> > >> > have all three latest documents together for ease of use.
> > >> >
> > >> > Let me know if the cover sheet, report, and guidelines make
sense
> > now
> > >> > as a package.
> > >> >
> > >> > best, Peter
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: Les Hawkins [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
> > >> > Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 7:03 AM
> > >> > To: Joan Schuitema
> > >> > Cc: Fletcher, Peter
> > >> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Revised;
> > >> > PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >> >
> > >> > Joan, Peter, Thanks. Yes this will be fine if Peter gives me
this
> > >> > information directly. It will be good to have a listing of the
> > >> > membership-
> > >> > right now the charge doesn't list members. --Les
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Joan Schuitema wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Les,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Peter found a correction he had to make in the original
> doc...so,
> > >> > > he's
> > >> >
> > >> > > attached a clean copy.  From what you did with the first
> version,
> > >> > looks
> > >> > > like the PDF comes out fine.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Peter will be naming one additional member to the
group....and
> > would
> > >> > like
> > >> > > the roster on the charge updated.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I've asked Peter to prepare a short cover page to be posted
> with
> > the
> > >>
> > >> > > 2
> > >> > docs
> > >> > > he's already sent that will include the following:
> > >> > > 1) Explains that this is an interim report and not yet
finished
> > >> > > 2) Briefly explains what the 2 documents are
> > >> > > 3) Identifies specific questions/areas the task group would
> like
> > to
> > >> > receive
> > >> > > input on
> > >> > > 4) a deadline for comments
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I've also asked him to correspond with you directly about
this.
> > Let
> > >> > me
> > >> > > know if that's ok with you.  I've tried a few times this
> > afternoon
> > >> > > to
> > >> > phone
> > >> > > and ask if this was ok, but you've been away from your desk.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks for all your help with this and have a good weekend!
> --js
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >Delivered-To: [log in to unmask] 
> > >> > > >Subject: Revised;
PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >> > > >Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:13:19 -0700
> > >> > > >X-MS-Has-Attach:
> > >> > > >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> > >> > > >Thread-Topic: Revised;
> > PCCnonLatinGuidelinesPrelimDraftRevised5.doc
> > >> > > >Thread-Index: AconY5V3klo0scfyQrWZp/DDkvUPbg==
> > >> > > >From: "Fletcher, Peter" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> > > >To: "Joan Schuitema" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> > > >X-UIC-Note: Already SA Checked - Bypassed: Too Big
> > >> > > >X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 128.248.155.57
> > >> > > >X-Spam-Status: unchecked - too big.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Joan, I had to correct and replace the Yiddish example on p.
3
> > of
> > >> > this
> > >> > > >draft. It had an incorrect transliteration. The other
examples
> > >> > > >should
> > >> > be
> > >> > > >ok. Sorry about that.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Also, the task force intends to fill in the special rules
> > sections
> > >> > (the
> > >> > > >incomplete sections), but that is also partly dependent on
the
> > >> > feedback we
> > >> > > >get from PCC on whether or not to allow exceptions to for
> > headings
> > >> > for
> > >> > > >some languages such as the right to left languages. I think
> Les
> > >> > mentioned
> > >> > > >something about wanting PCC to fill those in, but that is
not
> > our
> > >> > intent.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Peter
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager