LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  November 2009

ARSCLIST November 2009

Subject:

Re: Walt Whitman Recording

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:27:52 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (167 lines)

I guess the "famous voices" scamming gives the same thrill to the hoaxers as this new age of 
"everyone's a reality TV star" garbage like balloon boy and the fake US Chamber press conference. 
Surprising that CBS News and Murrow/Friendly would get duped so badly.

Mike's final point about hunting down original sources and documentation is so true. And to preserve 
original sources. There's a whole discussion to be had about making prudent preservation decisions 
so auto-pilot accumulation doesn't overwhelm important preservation. I'm not sure there's an ideal 
solution, but the topic should be discussed often and vigorously.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Biel" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Walt Whitman Recording


I've got a nifty disclosure about the "expert" later on in this.  Read
on ----

From: Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>
> The only thing I can't square with the "it's a fake" narrative is, why bother
> making a fake of "Walt Whitman" reading a piece of a somewhat obscure poem?
> Of all the voices to fake, what would be Haley's motivation to pick that
> voice and that poem? Was there a particularly keen interest in Walt Whitman
> at the time that radio show was produced where the recording first showed up?

It was not necessarily an interest specifically in Whitman, just an
interest in general in coming up with rare recordings of rare voices.
The 1950s was when a lot of the Col. Gouroud recordings and other
recordings made in the 1890s started to get wide publicity and exposure,
especially with the release of "Hark the Years" on Capitol from Bob
Vincent's collection narrated by Frederic March with music by Nat
Shilkret, a whole series of 7-inch microgrooves on the Rare Voices
label, some Ediphone LPs, several LPs of "X number of Presidents Speak",
two LPs put together by Walter Welch, and even the Bud Greenspan sports
LPs.  The spoken word LP came on strong during the 50s, and then
pranksters added into the mix the Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, and Grover
Cleveland recordings, trying to get them included and also trying to get
separate publicity for them.  Following the issue of Volume 3 of "I Can
Hear It Now" with all of the fake recordings, most historians started a
careful examination of historical recordings and these three I mentioned
did not pass the muster.

> Aren't there one or more Edison Site folks on this list? Is it possible
> to check Edison studio records and determine for sure that Whitman didn't
> make a recording? It seems like, that would solve the question once and
> for all, unless the studio records were generally known to be sloppy and
> incomplete.

Things that were not recorded in the studio for the record company were
not well documented.  Most of the recordings made by Thomas Edison
HIMSELF are not documented except the one for commercial release "Let Us
Not Forget".  The cylinder with piano playing and a slip saying "Edison"
is very controversial since some think it is TAE playing, but I think it
is probably one of the kids.  But it is known that there is no paperwork
suggesting a Whitman visit to Edison.

> Also, why does this guy Patrick quotes get into vertical-cut Edison disks?
> Haley claimed it was a cylinder, no?

Patrick does not quote anything about Edison discs.  It also looks to me
that this Dave Beauvais quote seems to say that the recording is a fake.
 This statement that it either is a fake or is  exceptionally well
equalized and that all Edison vertical recordings were superbly
equalized is a pile of crap.  Just because a recording was made on an
Edison machine doesn't make it an "Edison recording".  It would be more
than likely that if Whitman showed up to record it would be done on
whatever machine was convenient.  When the Edison company set out to
make a commercial record, an expert recorder can pick a horn and
recording head that might produce good results, but you don't "equalize"
acoustical recordings, you equalize electrical recordings AND WITH
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WE CAN EQUALIZE ELECTRICAL RECORDINGS TO TRY TO
SOUND LIKE ACOUSTICAL RECORDINGS.

> This definitely sounds like what Mike calls "dueling journal articles",
> but I have to say that Allen clearly did more gumshoe work. -- Tom Fine

What the hell is "Magic Media Services in Amherst, Massachusetts"??????
Do they work "magic" on old recordings?????????  Does he do it with "the
latest sound-reduction technology"?  Did he do the processing for the
ten buck copies Folsom was peddling to "curious WWQR readers"??

Folsom and Beauvais of Magic Media shows how much a novice they both are
is in the field of recordings when Beauvais stated it "'strains
credibility just a bit' to suppose anyone would have set out to fake the
strange and presumably 19th-century inflectional patterns he hears in
the recording".  NO IT DOESN"T.  I have mentioned other cases were it
had been done, and anyone who did not know of those cases is not worthy
to be paid attention to in a situation like this.  They obviously do not
have experience enough to be considered an expert.

At this point while writing this I was pissed off, and decided to Google
Dave Beauvais.  You won't believe what comes up about their "expert".
He ain't no expert in old recordings.  Not by a long shot.  Look at this
page.  It is astonishing that for all these years all these people have
been basing their belief that the Whitman recording is legit on THIS
GUY!!!!  http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dave-beauvais/5/794/607

THE RECORDING IS A FAKE, AND THE EXPERT IS A DOOFUS.

I do not know if there was any financial gain in these frauds, beyond
selling some of those lacquers I mentioned, or Folsom selling his ten
buck tapes.  Could be the thrill of fooling CBS into including the
Cleveland recording on their LP?  Over in the Old Time Radio world we
have a similar thing that has just become controversial.  A noted
reputable author, Martin Grams, posted last month that there is a second
recording of Welles Mercury Theatre "War of the Worlds" that has some
significant differences from the well known recording.  The loss of the
rehearsal recording has been well documented and there was no repeat
broadcast, so this announcement created some angry responses.  Martin
brought the recording to the live broadcast we did on YesterdayUSA on
Friday night from Grovers Mill, NJ, with Neal Ellis, Ken Stockinger,
myself, Leah, and Martin.   As we drove to the site, all of us
immediately spotted the differences, and Neal and I, being expert audio
editors, pronounced the recording a msnipulation and purposeful
tampering.  Spaces between sentences were trimmed, a musical phrase was
repeated, some verbal errors were poorly fixed, some phrases were
deleted, some speed and pitch manipulations were done, but NOTHING NEW
WAS ADDED.  This version has been in circulation for 5 or 10 years but
was never spotted until Martin noticed it.  Some people may have had it
without knowing it was not the real recording!  We are now in a search
to figure out when it entered the OTR stream and who might have done it.
 Nobody has ever tried to promote and sell it for financial gain and/or
notoriety, maybe because it would have been so easily debunked -- we had
it pegged within seconds.

But all of this shows how necessary it is that originals be protected
and archived.  We MUST be able to get back to as close to the original
as possible.

Mike Biel   [log in to unmask]


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Feaster" <[log in to unmask]>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> We seem to have a case of dueling journal articles. On our side is
>> Allen Koenigsburg's APM article and the other one that everyone on the
>> web seems to be referencing to is Ed Folsom, "The Whitman Recording,"
>> Walt Whitman Quarterly Review, 9 (Spring 1992), 214-16.
>
>
> Found the WWQR in the library here at Indiana University Bloomington. Here
> are the salient bits of the article:
>
> Folsom quotes Sam B's comments from NPR and then goes on: "But other experts
> disagree with Brylawski's analysis, and the consensus of those who have
> experience with wax cylinder recordings is that the recording is in fact an
> authentic 1890-era wax cylinder. Dave Beauvais, for example, who operates
> Magic Media Services in Amherst, Massachusetts....." A quotation from Mr.
> Beauvais follows. "This has either been exceptionally well equalized or its
> a fake," Sam had reportedly said, and Mr. Beauvais takes this as his cue to
> observe that collectors know Edison vertical-cut recordings were *all*
> superbly equalized; besides, it "strains credibility just a bit" to suppose
> anyone would have set out to fake the strange and presumably
> 19th-century inflectional patterns he hears in the recording.
>
> Later in the article, Folsom notes that tapes of the Whitman recording are
> available for curious WWQR readers to purchase at $10 apiece, processed with
> "the latest sound-reduction technology."
>
> - Patrick
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager