That 'bug' got me taken off the ARSCLIST for a few days....until ARSC  
reinstated me.
 
Don Chichester
 
In a message dated 12/31/2009 8:24:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Thanks  David for the  information.

Regards,
Marc



-----Original  Message-----
From: David Goren <[log in to unmask]>
To:  [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tue, Dec 29, 2009 8:46 pm
Subject: Re:  [ARSCLIST] Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]


It's  a feature, not a bug. 

Ok, it's a bug, and it always happens when a  message is posted. Just 
ignore it. 

On Dec 29, 2009, at 10:42 PM, Marc  Hildebrant wrote: 

> Group...HELP! Each message I post causes this  one too. What is going > 
on? 
> 
> Regards, 
> Marc  
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From:  LISTSERV.LOC.GOV LISTSERV Server (14.5) <[log in to unmask]> 
> To:  Marc Hildebrant <[log in to unmask]> 
> Sent: Sun, Dec 27, 2009  10:38 am 
> Subject: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]  
> 
> 
> Your message is being returned to you unprocessed  because it > appears 
to have 
> lready been distributed to the  ARSCLIST list. That is, a > message with 
> dentical text (but  possibly with different mail headers) has been > 
posted to 
> he list  recently, either by you or by someone else. If you have > reason 
to  
> esend this message to the list (for instance because you have been  > 
notified of 
> hardware failure with loss of data), please alter  the text of the > 
message in 
> ome way and resend it to the list.  Note that altering the > "Subject:" 
line or 
> dding blank lines at  the top or bottom of the message is not > 
sufficient; you 
> hould  instead add a sentence or two at the top explaining > why you are 
>  esending the message, so that the other subscribers understand > why 
they  are 
> etting two copies of the same message. 
> 
> 
>  Attached Message 
> 
> 
> From: 
> Marc Hildebrant  <[log in to unmask]> 
> 
> To: 
>  [log in to unmask] 
> 
> Subject: 
> [ARSCLIST]  Thanks and How to make One ? 
> 
> Date: 
> Sun, 27 Dec 2009  12:25:05 -0500 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ammy, 
>  Well, I'll keep looking around. Maybe the best approach is to make > my  
own. 
> Is there any information available on the techniques people have  > used 
to record 
> rom the cylinders ? 
> Regards, 
>  arc