LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  December 2009

ARSCLIST December 2009

Subject:

Re: Cataloging of metal parts

From:

Tom Fine <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 12 Dec 2009 15:36:13 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (227 lines)

This is a nice assemblage of information. Thanks Goran.

I always heard what is here called the "son" stage referred to as a "stamper" but all the 
terminology I heard was USA circa 1960's, so "son" may well have been used in Europe all along and 
became global later on.

Both terms make sense to me. "Son" is a logical extension of the "father" and "mother" stages. But 
"stamper" says in one word exactly what the part does, it stamps it imprint onto whatever pressed 
media is being manufactured, the result being playback-ready.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Goran Finnberg" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2009 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cataloging of metal parts


Michael Biel:

> Actually I don't think that anyone has ever heard of it.

> I have read hundreds of books, articles, instruction
> manuals, guidebooks, etc. about recording techniques
> and technology dating from all eras of the industry,
> but have never seen anything relating the stamper to
> the word "son".  Can you cite me some specific sources
> in print that use this term?  I'm not saying that it
> has never been used, but it must be quite uncommon, at
> least in English.

I have worked as a consultant to Skandinaviska Grammofon AB in Amal, Sweden,
owned by EMI for most of its life, 1974 to 1989.

It was supposed to be the largest vinyl record pressing plant in Europe at
that time mid 70┤s.

All the production people called the parts Father, Mother and Son. Including
calls to EMI England, or when EMI people turned up at the factory in Sweden.

Toolex-Alpha once world leader in vinyl pressing equipment called the parts
Father, Mother and Son in the tree day seminar I went to in the 70┤s. And
this continued when they began producing presses for CD production when I
helped out some friends who started Logos AB here in Gothenburg which was
once a cassette duplicating plant but later on started producing CD┤s.

Sonopress in Germany, and many more too many to list, also referred them to
be Father, Mother and Son.

In fact dealing with hundreds upon hundreds of companies professionally
involved with mass duplication of Vinyl or CD disks here in Europe  I have
always seen, Father, Mother and Son, to be used as description of the three
stages used to provide a replicated LP/CD disk to be used as the final
carrier to be sold in the retail shop.

Using Google with the keywords:

Record Pressing Father mother son stamper

Turned up several hundred hits to numerous to list here but I looked at a
few:


http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/sep03/articles/artwork.htm

The etched glass master is not used to stamp discs itself, but is used to
create a metal stamper through a process called electroforming. A layer of
nickle is effectively grown onto the disc, transferring the etched pits on
the glass into bumps in the metal disc to produce a 'father' disc. For very
short CD pressing runs, this father can be used as the direct stamper, but
it is more common to produce one or more 'mother' discs from the father, and
then several 'sons' from each mother. The sons are used as stampers to
produce the raw plastic CD discs

-------------------------

http://www.pctechguide.com/32CD-ROM_Manufacturing.htm

In a process known as "electroforming", the metalised glass master has a
layer of nickel grown onto its silver surface by immersion in a tank of
nickel sulphamate solution. This sheet of nickel - referred to as the
"father" - is subsequently removed from the silver. The father is a reverse
image of the data and could be used to stamp discs. However, it is not.
Instead, the father is returned to the electroforming tank where another
layer of nickel is grown and subsequently removed to create a "mother". The
mother undergoes the same process to produce a "stamper" (sometimes referred
to as a "son"). Several stampers can be grown from the same mother.
CD Pit Structure

-------------------------

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0232928.html

" Also, a mother stamper or a son stamper may be manufactured from the
father stamper. "

-------------------------

http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090195925

[0106]Further, in the same manner as a procedure of obtaining the mother
stamper from the father stamper, an oxide film is formed on a surface of the
mother stamper, and an Ni film is electroformed and released, thereby
obtaining a son stamper having the same patterns of the father stamper.

---------------------------

http://www.odiscs.com/cd/cd_structures_formed.htm

After the exposed areas are developed away by conventional methods to
produce pits, a rigid metal negative to the master, called the Father or
Master stamper, is produced by an electoplating process (see Figure 2).

A multiple positive image Mother may be electroplated from the Father
stamper. In turn, negative image Son stampers are plated from each Mother to
produce multiple copies of the original master.

Mass replication of the source begins by mounting a Father or Son in a
molding press. Melted plastic is injected into the cavity and allowed to
cool. The pits from the stamper are accurately reproduced in a plastic
substrate, forming the original positive image.

--------------------------

http://www.answers.com/topic/compact-disc

Next, the newly applied metal layer is pulled apart from the disc master,
which is put aside. The metal layer, or father, contains a negative
impression of the disc master track; in other words, the track on the metal
layer is an exact replica, but in reverse, of the track on the disc master.
*    The metal father then undergoes further electroforming to produce one
or more mothers, which are simply metal layers that again have positive
impressions of the original disc master track. Using the same electroforming
process, each mother then produces a son (also called a stamper) with a
negative impression of the track. It is the son that is then used to create
the actual CD.
*    After being separated from the mother, the metal son is rinsed, dried,
polished and put in a punching machine that cuts out the center hole and
forms the desired outside diameter.

--------------------------------------

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6814897.html

According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, a first metallic (Ni)
mold tool (father) is made which is a duplicate of a master substrate, then
a resin mold tool (mother) is made which is a duplicate of the first
metallic mold tool and finally a second metallic (Ni) mold tool (son) is
made which is a duplicate of the resin mold tool. Both the father and son
may be referred to a │stamper▓.

---------------------------------------

As I have also had to deal with Georg Neumann record cutting equipment then
all the descriptions dealing with what happens after the laquer being cut
then the descriptive words Father, Mother, Son was always used.

Nowadays I am helping a young man who have bought an old Neumann VMS66
cutter here in Gothenburg and he recently added record plating equipment to
his services and without no promting from me he called the process Father,
Mother Son when he spoke about this process as he had learnt it from the
previous owner.

http://www.tailrecvinyl.com/

So to me at least, this is universally used here in most parts of Europe.

But looking in the 1973 edition of the EMI Technical Glossary page M2 says:

MATRIX:

A metal part, originally produced from a laquer master, by the
electrodeposition of nickel:

1. Metal Master (Negative).
2. Metal Mother (Positive).
3. Metal Stamper (Negative).

It is stated at the very beginning:

The terms used here are the most commonly used in the recording and
manufacture of gramophone records.

Gilbert Briggs, owner of Wharfedale loudspeakers, England in his book A to Z
in audio, 11/1960 states on page 166:

The sequence of record processing is as follows:

1.Laquer original - positive.
2 Metal Master - negative.
3 Metal Mother - positive.
4 Metal stamper, known as the working matrix - negative;
5 pressing - positive.

The above presumably comes from the DECCA/London pressing plant at that
time.

And I just consider the use of the above to be as common in certain quarters
as Father, Mother, Son is to me.

None of them is wrong one should just be aware that depending on where you
are in the word that different words are used to describe the exact same
process.

I could just use the word "Working Matrix" to describe the Son or Stamper
and old ones in the production industry would understand at once what I
meant.

Work part can be used too in a pinch....;-)



-- 

Best regards,

Goran Finnberg
The Mastering Room AB
Goteborg
Sweden

E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Learn from the mistakes of others, you can never live long enough to
make them all yourself.    -   John Luther

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager