On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 1. "what are the requirements driving further development of the format?"
> This listserv was created in part to gather requirements. That, at least
> during the initial phase, is what this discussion is for.
> 2. "I would suggest that compatibility with the W3C date-time standard
> should be a high priority."
> Could you elaborate on what you mean by "the W3C date-time standard". Do
> you mean W3CDTF? One of the (implicit) assumptions behind this effort is
> that edtf will be compatible with (i.e. a superset of) W3CDTF.
Yes; just saying this should be an explicit requirement.