LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EAD Archives


EAD Archives

EAD Archives


EAD@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EAD Home

EAD Home

EAD  December 2009

EAD December 2009

Subject:

Re: use of <otherfindaid> tag

From:

Jane Stevenson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Encoded Archival Description List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:36:25 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (232 lines)

Hi all,

 >>Basically what I'm trying to do is get away from creating static html pages to store on our 
server and just present the view and print options through xml and xsl.

This has prompted me to think about a rather different question - we're actually thinking of 
creating static html pages in addition to our XSL generated pages because we want our descriptions 
to be exposed to Google. Alternatively we could create pre-generated searches. We don't just open up 
our system to robots due to problems with overloading the system. Has anyone had any experience of 
this kind of thing? It would be useful to get your thoughts.

cheers,
Jane.

**************************************************************
Jane Stevenson

Archives Hub Co-ordinator
Mimas
University of Manchester
Email:   [log in to unmask]
http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk




Fox, Michael wrote:
> There is a proof of concept stylesheet on the EAD help pages that does 
> this, namely use XSL:FO to generate an XML document in Formatting 
> Objects syntax (XSL:FO) that an FO processor could subsequently convert 
> to PDF.     If you use Oxygen, the necessary tools (an XSLT engine and 
> the FOP processor)  are already bundled in.   I believe the same is true 
> of the XML Spy software.
> 
>  
> 
> There is also another stylesheet at the same location that goes from EAD 
> directly to WordML using a standard XSL transformation, though I do not 
> know if the syntax of this stylesheet still reflects Microsoft's current 
> schema for Word.    After transformation, the output can be opened 
> directly in a recent version of Word and edited or printed as required.
> 
>  
> 
> In these scenarios, your EAD XML instance could truly serve as your 
> canonical version.
> 
>  
> 
> Finally, there is another option with one of the EAD Cookbook 
> stylesheets that produces an HTML page that has no links and so could be 
> imported into Word and printed from there.  A bit messier but far easier 
> to pull off.
> 
>  
> 
> Michael Fox
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> *From:* Encoded Archival Description List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On 
> Behalf Of *Ethan Gruber
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2009 3:37 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: use of <otherfindaid> tag
> 
>  
> 
> You can create XSLT stylesheets that contain Formatting Objects 
> specifications, and then serialize to PDF dynamically with calls to the 
> fop processor.
> 
> Ethan
> 
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Franks, Russell <[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> 
> Thank you Jane and Michele for the clarifications and thoughts.
> 
> Michele, I like your method of generating a print page via the style 
> sheet. Is this done with javascript? Or is it an xsl template that 
> dynamically creates a new printer friendly page?
> 
> Basically what I'm trying to do is get away from creating static html 
> pages to store on our server and just present the view and print options 
> through xml and xsl.
> 
> Thanks - Russ
> 
> 
> Russell Franks
> Librarian
> Special and Archival Collections
> Phillips Memorial Library
> Providence College
> 1 Cunningham Square
> Providence, RI 02918-0001
> 401-865-2578
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> http://www.providence.edu/archives
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Encoded Archival Description List [mailto:[log in to unmask] 
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Jane Stevenson
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 4:04 AM
> To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> 
> Subject: Re: use of <otherfindaid> tag
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> We (our contributors) use <archref> to link to separately described 
> parts of a finding aid, such as
> where a description is extremely large and benefits from being divided 
> up. This is in line with the
> guidance: 'Examples of such materials include a record group and one of 
> its large series (which
> might have separate EAD-encoded finding aids)'
> 
> However, our contributors can also use it to link to other parts of the 
> same finding aid, which may
> not be strictly within the guidelines, but it seems to be the best 
> choice for this.
> http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/arch/archref.shtml. It is not totally 
> straightforward for us to
> implement these links, due to the way the Archives Hub is set up as a 
> distributed system with
> machine interfaces.
> 
> We use <otherfindaid> to indicate other finding aids for the same material:
> http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/arch/other.shtml
> 
> So that differs from linking to other finding aids that are related but 
> not representing the same
> material. The guidelines do say that it is for 'Information about 
> additional or alternative guides
> to the described material'. When contributors use this tag, they are 
> usually pointing to a more
> detailed resource rather than the same content in a different format, 
> but I would assume that it
> could be the same.
> 
> Jane.
> 
> **************************************************************
> Jane Stevenson
> 
> Archives Hub Co-ordinator
> http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk
> 
> 
> Michele R Combs wrote:
>  > My understanding of archref is that it's for links to other 
> collections of archival material.  We
>  > use archref to link to related collections.  For example, we would 
> use archref to link from the
>  > finding aid for the papers of John Smith Jr. to the finding aid for 
> the papers of his father,
>  > John Smith Sr., or the papers of his son, John Smith III.
>  >
>  > My understanding of otherfindaid is that it's for links to finding 
> aids that are different in
>  > content, not just in file format.  For example, we might include in 
> the otherfindaid section a
>  > link to an Excel spreadsheet that provides a finer level of detail 
> for a set of John Smith Jr's
>  > photographs, or a link to a published catalog of John Smith Jr's 
> letters, or similar.
>  >
>  > To simply point to another version of the online finding aid, we have 
> a link at the top of each
>  > one that says "Printer friendly version." This link is generated by 
> our XSL style sheet and is
>  > not hard-coded into our EAD.
>  >
>  > Michele
>  >
>  > (be green - don't print this email!) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Michele Combs 
> Manuscripts Librarian
>  > Special Collections Research Center Syracuse University Libraries 222 
> Waverly Ave. Syracuse, NY
>  > 13244 315-443-2081 [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > -----Original Message----- From: Encoded Archival Description List 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf
>  > Of Franks, Russell Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:00 PM To: 
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> Subject: use
>  > of <otherfindaid> tag
>  >
>  > Hello,
>  >
>  > Is anyone using the <otherfindaid> tag to describe or point to 
> another version of a finding aid,
>  > such as a PDF version of the finding aid for patrons to dl or print?
>  >
>  > According to the tag library <otherfindaid> "is used to indicate the 
> existence of additional
>  > finding aids;" and that "The <archref> element may be used to give a 
> formal citation to the other
>  > finding aid or to link to an online version of it."
>  >
>  > It doesn't appear that the <otherfindaid> tag is limited to other 
> finding aids created by
>  > differing institutions or to legacy versions of the same finding aid.
>  >
>  > Also do I have to use the <archref> tag to link to the PDF? Since the 
> PDF version of the finding
>  > aid is not "separately described archival materials of special 
> interest", it seems to me that the
>  > use of the <extref> would be better suited for this purpose.
>  >
>  >
>  > Thanks in advance for your thoughts -
>  >
>  > Russell Franks Librarian Special and Archival Collections Phillips 
> Memorial Library Providence
>  > College 1 Cunningham Square Providence, RI 02918-0001 401-865-2578 
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>  > [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
> http://www.providence.edu/archives
>  >
> 
>  
> 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
December 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager