Fine for me - I agree
(so Mong will come after Hmong - as a synonym, but Hmong is something like
considered as "preferred"?)
Best regards
Christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von
Rebecca S Guenther
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2010 23:27
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Fwd: ISO 639-2 Language Code Change Request
Dear ISO 639 JAC members:
Please let me know if you have any objections to making this change. I do
not think we really need a ballot. Please let me know by Feb. 22.
Rebecca
>>> NDMSO <[log in to unmask]> 2/3/2010 11:05 AM >>>
ISO 639-2 Language Code Change Request.
English name of Language: Hmong
French name of Language: hmong
iso_639_2_b: hmn
iso_639_2_t: hmn
change_requested: Add Mong as a name used with this code element.
Both the voiceless bilabial nasal (\"hm\" in roman orthographies)
and the voiced bilabial nasal (\"m\") are used in the autonyms of
varieties across the language communities encompassed by [hmn]. See comments
associated with documentation for the change request
http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_detail.asp?id=2009-090
Submitter's name: Joan Spanne
Submitter's email : [log in to unmask]
Submitter's status : ISO 639-3 registrar
|