Art Shifrin wrote:
> I am reposting this because it was rejected by the evidently absurd criteria
> of redundancy that 'rules' this list.
> It happens (at least to me) too often. IF it is again rejected, then I will desist from trying
> tio share information with this list: instead
> providing information only to specific posters.
You are not paying attention. This has been explained on the list over
and over and over and over.
EVERYBODY GETS THIS MESSAGE *EVERY* TIME AND EVERYTHING GETS POSTED
I will get a message about this message. And you will get another if
you post a reply. It just happens and the Library of Congress seems to
be unable to fix the problem, so we live with it and keep telling
newbies and others who haven't been paying attention about the problem
again and again.
Perhaps George Brock-Nannestad can give us the statistic on how many
times someone has told a poster about this problem. Must be, what, 30
or 40 times at least.
Mike Biel [log in to unmask]