Great post Mike. Almost fell from my chair laughing. Now I'm going to
get one as well LOL :-D
On 3/14/2010 1:46 AM, Michael Biel wrote:
> Art Shifrin wrote:
>> I am reposting this because it was rejected by the evidently absurd
>> of redundancy that 'rules' this list.
>> It happens (at least to me) too often. IF it is again rejected, then
>> I will desist from trying
>> tio share information with this list: instead
>> providing information only to specific posters.
> You are not paying attention. This has been explained on the list over
> and over and over and over.
> EVERYBODY GETS THIS MESSAGE *EVERY* TIME AND EVERYTHING GETS POSTED
> I will get a message about this message. And you will get another if
> you post a reply. It just happens and the Library of Congress seems
> to be unable to fix the problem, so we live with it and keep telling
> newbies and others who haven't been paying attention about the problem
> again and again.
> Perhaps George Brock-Nannestad can give us the statistic on how many
> times someone has told a poster about this problem. Must be, what, 30
> or 40 times at least.
> Mike Biel [log in to unmask]