LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB Archives

FEDLIB Archives


FEDLIB@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB Home

FEDLIB  March 2010

FEDLIB March 2010

Subject:

Re: Intangible Awards

From:

"Hadden, Robert L AGC" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

FEDLIB: Federal Librarians Discussion List

Date:

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:22:53 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (99 lines)

	Federal Libraries have always had the authority to grant intangible
prizes. These are prizes and awards that have no value in themselves, but can
have great importance to the receiver. The real purpose of the award is also
to create intangible ribbons (the Golden Chord) of good will between the
library and the awardees. This use of intangibles is one of the secrets of
good kingmanship.
	"Employee of the Month" or "Government Employee of the Month (GEM)"
prizes can lead to such dainties as a special parking place for a month. A
certificate is nice, and this award always looks good on a resume. An annual
"Patron of the Year", "Volunteer of the Year" or "2010 Friend of the Library"
plaque is nice, and recognizes people who help out a bunch, and who are
otherwise unrecognized. One library I know has a list of books that it would
like to have, but usually don't quite have the funds to purchase. The
Employee of the Month is given the choice of selecting one of these books
from the list, which then have a bookplate placed inside saying it was
selected for the library by so-and-so. The money is thus spent on a gift (get
it?), rather than the usual selection process, so the library wins, the
collection wins, the employee (often a technician who often has no authority
in the library) gets to make a selection.
	Special titles can also be used, some in fun, some serious. Anyone
can spend some time and money and get a "Master of Library Science", but how
many "Baron of Librarianship" or "Princess of Librarians" certificate holders
do you know? When I worked in Korea, the library staff were terrified of my
supervisor, who as an older woman, was able to lambast anything and anyone
she wanted, and was often very rough with her tongue. She was called "The
Dragon Lady" by the Koreans. Annoyed that my staff paid more attention to her
infrequent visits than they did to me, I had a special nameplate made for my
desk, with the letters "C.D.L." placed after my name. It stood for "Chief
Dragon Librarian." Thirty years later, I still enjoy looking at it.
	Many scientists get books on their own, to review for a journal or
for consideration as textbooks in classes, and after reading them pass the
books on to the library as donations. A small brass plaque on a desk or a
special bookplate with their name on it inside each book is a nice reward. Or
simply their photograph framed and put on the library wall.
	Federal buildings have strict rules about naming, but rooms, carrels
or stack areas within the library can be named after donors, deceased
librarians (hopefully with rich surviving relatives) or other persons who
helped the library. Indeed, within many agencies, the library has a prime
location for these honors. The US Geological Survey Library, for instance,
named its map collection after Mark Pangborn, who was the map librarian there
during World War II.
	A library friends group can often offer a prize instead of the
library. This still keeps the library in the news, and is exempt from many of
the federal regulations on prize giving.
	This whole awards thing can come down in ruins if it is seen as brown
nosing to upper management. People up the chain of command should not be
honored; only people down the chain of command, or sideways (patrons not
otherwise part of the hierarchy, for instance) or those outside the
government entirely. What you want to do is to collect friends from outside
the chain of command or even the agency, who will probably support your
library in time of need tomorrow.
	Remember, the purpose of these types of prizes are to maintain morale
among the staff, and most importantly, to promote the library. They really
should have a main purpose for publicity and good will toward the library,
which pays off during budget times. The agencies' public affairs office
should always be contacted when one is given, and photographs of the event
made and presented.
	My opinions, anyway.

Lee

R. Lee Hadden
Geospatial Information Library (Map Library))
U. S. Army Geospatial Center
ATTN: CEAGS-WSG (Hadden)
7701 Telegraph Road
Alexandria, VA 22315-3864
(703) 428-9206
[log in to unmask]

I'm shaving my head to fight cancer on Saturday. Join me in the fight by
going to my webpage at:
http://www.stbaldricks.org/participants/mypage/participantid/371428

-----Original Message-----
From: FEDLIB: Federal Librarians Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Faget, Nancy
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 7:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Which types of challenges and contests can federal libraries
sponsor?

I wonder how federal libraries and information centers can use these types of
contests, prizes, challenges 
 
The White House has issued a memo entitled "Guidance on the Use of Challenges
and Prizes to Promote Open Government".  "This memorandum highlights for
agencies policy and legal issues related to the implementation of the Obama
Administration's commitment to increase the use of prizes and challenges as
tools for promoting open government, innovation, and other national
priorities."
 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-11.pdf
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-11.pdf> 
 
 
 
 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager