LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCLIST Archives


PCCLIST Archives

PCCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST Home

PCCLIST  March 2010

PCCLIST March 2010

Subject:

Re: BSR/GMconsolidated

From:

"Arakawa, Steven" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:17:54 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (106 lines)

Re the indicators for parallel titles, I'm confused-- this is on the BSR FAQ:

20. Why does the BSR MAP stipulate 246 31 for parallel titles but the CONSER MAP 246 11? Why use different indicators for the same concept in different formats?
Discussion of this field recently among task force members and PoCo resulted in the recent agreement that in order to promote consistency among formats we recommend changing the BSR parallel record policy to be in conformance with serial practice (i.e., that we would change the BSR for parallel titles to use Field 246 with indicators 11).

Are we now changing the guidelines and going back to 31 for parallel titles?

Steven Arakawa
Catalog Librarian for Training & Documentation
Catalog & Metadata Services, SML, Yale University
P.O. Box 208240 New Haven, CT 06520-8240 
(203)432-8286 [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Iris Wolley
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:56 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: BSR/GMconsolidated

Hello
Thanks for forwarding this, Rebecca.

The 246:13: was chosen for the BSR as the first indicator 1 = note, and
second indicator 3 = other title. This usage is for varying titles (not
to be confused with variant titles on an authority record). The second
indicator 3 is defined in MARC 21 as "other title" associated with the
piece item. Using 246:13: for titles other than parallel titles
indicates that a note and a title added entry are generated from this
field. Second indicator 3 was chosen as a replacement for use of second
indicators, 4, 7, 8, etc. For sake of clarity, please note that in the
BSR print monographs and graphic materials parallel titles are placed in
a 246:31: field.

I disagree with the use of 246:1#: in the BSRs. Of course, Dave, or any
other cataloger can use whatever 246s they prefer. But for the BIBCO
Standard Records I think the 246:13: is the tag that can be used for all
varying titles appearing either on the item, or associated with the item.

I am in hopes that the 246:#1: will be removed from any BSRs and the
246:13: be kept for varying titles. As stated the use of 246:31: for
parallel titles is in the BSR.

Best regards,

Iris Wolley
Columbia University
New York, NY

Culbertson, Rebecca wrote:
>
> Colleagues-
>
> Attached is the consolidated comments for the Vis Graphic Materials. A
> couple things to note here:
>
> 1. I added the 007 for microforms, but am noting that this wasn't part
> of the original core for graphic materials.
>
> 2. Clip from an email from Dave today. I have to confess that I still
> don't exactly understand how this would affect catalogers and whether
> we should change.
>
> "VARIANT TITLES IN 246 FIELD:I want to bring up another issue, the
> alternative to use 246 indicators "13" when you don't want to use the
> more appropriate values. To be more correct in MARC, I would like to
> change to using "1#" as the defaults if you don't use more appropriate
> values. "3" for "other" is defined as meaning none of the other values
> are appropriate. This isn't true, there are values that are
> appropriate, usually, we're just not choosing to use them. That is
> what value "#" means-- you are not specifying a type.
>
> I realize this means changing the BOOK BSR, too, but it needs to be
> opened up again anyway because of other things it looks like we are
> making standard (e.g., 500 Source of title note *(if other than chief
> source)*; and 007 field for microform reproductions)"
>
> I did include Dave's 246 1# in the chart, but does this mean 246 13 or
> no 246 13?
>
> 3. Note that the TG includes the 655 as A. I think this is ok for all
> the AV formats-actually everything except Books at this point? The
> text in their Labels and notes area is similar to the books BSR, but
> does allude to genre headings. I like it as is.
>
> Becky
>
> *Rebecca Culbertson*
>
> Shared Cataloging Program
>
> California Digital Library
>
> Metadata Services Department
>
> University of California, San Diego
>
> La Jolla, California 92093-0175
>
> (858) 822-6415 (Phone)
>
> (858) 822-0349 (Fax)
>
> "If at first you don't succeed, change the rules"
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager