Dear PCC LISTSERV
My apologies! I suppose it happens to everyone sooner or later, but last night I accidently sent the message below to the wrong listserv. It was meant to go just to the Standards Committee. We are currently deep into reviewing the non-Book BSRs. You all will see this again, but later...
Becky
-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stephen Early
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:07 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCLIST] BSR/GMconsolidated
Cross posted to CONSER:
Regarding the question about 246 1# and 246 13, maybe the already existing CONSER Standard Record documentation may help to clarify? :
"Use indicators 1 [blank] and $i any time a note is needed for a variant title including the need to provide applicable date ranges for additional parallel titles that appear on later issues. Use indicators 13 for all other variant titles, including acronyms/initialisms."
Also I note that CSR uses different 246 indicators for parallel titles:
"Use indicators 11 for parallel titles."
I have no major stake in whether first indicator "3" or "1" is preferred for parallel, but I would prefer consistency between BSR and CSR on the matter (I am strangely reminded of some recent bill whose "House" and "Senate" versions needed reconciliation ... )
Stephen T. Early
Cataloger
Center for Research Libraries
6050 S. Kenwood
Chicago, IL 60637
773-955-4545
[log in to unmask]
CRL website: www.crl.edu
________________________________________
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Culbertson, Rebecca
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCLIST] BSR/GMconsolidated
Colleagues-
Attached is the consolidated comments for the Vis Graphic Materials. A couple things to note here:
|
