LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  March 2010

PCCTG1 March 2010

Subject:

Re: Non Latin document final check

From:

"Fletcher, Peter" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:30:33 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (145 lines)

Thanks, sorry, I didn't realize that David wanted that also as part of
the statement. Why not.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of D. Brooking
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 4:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCTG1] Non Latin document final check

I like the phrase after the dashes too, as a final selling point.

  a simple "cut and paste"
> will usually make this an efficient process and extend the benefit
> beyond a single bibliographic record."



************
Diana Brooking             (206) 685-0389
Cataloging Librarian       (206) 685-8782 fax
Suzzallo Library           [log in to unmask]
University of Washington
Box 352900
Seattle WA  98195-2900

On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Fletcher, Peter wrote:

> I'll add the text as David wrote it here: When PCC catalogers do
supply
> parallel fields for headings in bibliographic records, they are
strongly
> encouraged to replicate this intellectual work as non-Latin variants
in
> authority records as part of NACO.
>
> Unless anyone is violently opposed.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Program for Cooperative Cataloging [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of David W Reser
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:41 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [PCCTG1] Non Latin document final check
>
> Robert-- I don't think we could require it, but your added thoughts
may
> suggest a few additional words to be added to the effect of you came
> this far, why not go a little further, e.g., "When PCC catalogers do
> supply parallel fields for headings in bibliographic records, they are
> strongly encouraged to replicate this intellectual work as non-Latin
> variants in authority records as part of NACO-- a simple "cut and
paste"
> will usually make this an efficient process and extend the benefit
> beyond a single bibliographic record."
>
> OK?
> Dave
>
>>>> Robert Rendall <[log in to unmask]> 3/22/2010 3:25 PM >>>
> The set of changes I made in that document was meant to be limited to
> cosmetic and uncontroversial ones, so it definitely doesn't reflect
> everything we discussed last week!
>
> On your point 4, non-Latin references are not required in authority
> records, and neither are non-Latin headings in bib. records, but could
> we require a cataloger exercising the option to enter a non-Latin
> heading in a bib. record to also add it to the corresponding authority
> record?  Maybe not, but I'll just ask.
>
> Robert.
>
> David W Reser wrote:
>> Boy, I picked the wrong Friday to be off!  Just catching up with the
> many messages-- rather than try to respond to each, I'll respond to
> Robert's revision that was attached to this message and throw in a few
> additional things.
>>
>> First, I agree with all of Robert's changes.
>>
>> 1.  Second paragraph, last sentence refers to "MARC formats" but I
> think what was meant was MARC record types (formats at this point
would
> mean bibliographic, authority, holdings).
>>
>> 2.  Section 2, general guidelines:  Please change the link to the
> ALA-LC romanization tables to:
>>
>> http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.standards/docs.roman
>> (we assigned a persistent URL to publish in RDA and other places,
> particularly useful since it is not known how long the "cpso" domain
> will last).
>>
>> 3.  Section 2.3.1:  Example for   Xun yi cao de chun tian  [I think
> there was an earlier comment to delete the example, to which I would
> concur-- not really clear what is being illustrated here]
>>
>> 4.  Section 2.5, first paragraph, last sentence.  I would agree with
> strengthening the statement somewhat (It is *strongly* recommended
...),
> but since non-Latin variants are optional in NACO, you can't really
say
> "should" as some have suggested in other messages.
>>
>> Thanks for all the hard work!
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>>>> Robert Rendall <[log in to unmask]> 3/22/2010 1:42 PM >>>
>>>>>
>> Attached is a copy of the original Word document (not reflecting any
>> more recent changes Peter has made) with tracked editing changes
>> (spaces, capitalization, punctuation, indenting "not" examples, some
>> wording) to the opening text, the Introduction, and sections 1, 2,
> 2.1,
>> 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.2.2, 3.2.3, and 3.3.1.
>>
>> Indenting the "not" examples doesn't seem to show up in tracked
> changes
>> but I think it sets them off better.
>>
>> Robert.
>>
>> Fletcher, Peter wrote:
>>
>>> All, also, please, when you send me (or to the list) a revised,
track
>
>>> changes of the document, name it with your name, for example,
>>> Non-LatinRobertMarch19, or something like that so I can keep track.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks, Peter
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager