Quoting "Fletcher, Peter" <[log in to unmask]>:
> I also removed the option for optional fields to be added in
> non-Latin only--this is allowed in OCLC, but it would not be a PCC
> record if it were an option
I thought we put that option in intentionally because LC was adding
unpaired non-Latin contents fields? I think we should leave this the
way it was. Or maybe I'm just confused. I'm home so I shouldn't be
reading this anyway.
Robert.
|