In the case of Whiteman's 1928 Columbia Concerto In F, you'd have to listen
in this order: sides 1-2-3-4-6-5.   BUT between 6 & 5, you'd have to listen
to "Jeanine I Dream Of Lilac Time" and endure Jack Fulton's vocal...assuming
that the info's correct in my edition of Brian Rust's 'The American Dance
Band Discography 1917 - 1942.

Also, can we coin a term to replace discography?  If taken literally, then
no cylinders should be listed within them....

Art (Shiffy) Shifrin




On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:48 PM, David Weiner <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Michael Biel" <[log in to unmask]>
> > I have the exact opposite attitude.  The body of work of a performer
> > exists as it was recorded in the studio.  The ordering of the items in
> > the album is usually an afterthought that rarely includes the performer
>
> ---------
> Who is to say whether of not the order of tunes recorded at a session has
> any significance either?  Should we listen to Whiteman's 1927 RHAPSODY IN
> BLUE with Part 2 before Part 1 because he recorded it that way?
>
> Dave Weiner
>
>
>