On 1 Jun 2010, at 13:13, Francois Demay wrote:
> While in the ex-Yougoslavia the NEW Countries did all go that way...
> ISO did not say "NO ADMISSION" to Croatian, Serbian, Bosnian.
Because there were linguistic differences given.
> And now (when it is too late to go backwards) ISO will say NO to Montenegrin.
> How can you justify the difference of treatment ?
Because no linguistic difference has been shown.
> Saying that "Montenegrin is JUST an other NAME for Serbian" will be resented as a PROVOCATION.
"Prove that Montenegrin differs in any significant way from Serbian".
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
|