Jonathan - I have no control over the OASIS web page (if by that you mean
anything under http://www.oasis-open.org/), which is why I created
http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/ because I can offer these documents
in a way that seems to make sense (at least to me) and in fact, I cannot
even call these "official" drafts according to OASIS, you just have to take
me at faith that I will maintain copies.
We will put together a summary of the changes as soon as possible.
--Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CQL 2.0?
Can anyone summarize the changes at this point (anticipated or already)
between CQL 1.2 and CQL 2.0?
Also, if you guys who control web pages could list a link to the CQL 2.0
draft next to the links to the SRU 2.0 draft on the OASIS web page and the
loc web page and other places that list such things -- it would make it
somewhat more findable.
Specs that people in the know are already using in production (even if they
are draft), but people not in the know have trouble finding out it even
exists -- not neccesarily the best way to get to a spec that's actually
adopted by any larger community than the people on the standards committee.
Jonathan
Mike Taylor wrote:
> On 2 June 2010 14:44, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>
>> The OASIS SWS TC is developing a CQL spec in parallel with SRU 2.0.
>>
>> The most recent draft is at
>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/cql.doc
>>
>> There is a link to the SRU and CQL drafts on the SRU home page
>> http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/ .
>>
>
> I note with dismay, but not surprise, that this STILL prohibits
> perfectly reasonable queries like
> author=(kernighan or knuth)
> and thus that we will have to, once more, ignore the specification in
> order to produce useful tools. *sigh*
>
>
>
>> --Ray
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SRU (Search and Retrieve Via URL) Implementors
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rochkind
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 6:17 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: CQL 2.0?
>>
>> I've seen the draft SRU 2.0 spec, but it doesn't seem to reference or
>> include a CQL spec.
>>
>> Is CQL for SRU 1.4 still the operative CQL spec for SRU 2.0?
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
|