LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2010

ARSCLIST August 2010

Subject:

Re: music man murray record collection & Murray Gershenz, music collector extraordinaire, is parting with his entire music library.

From:

Michael Biel <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:49:57 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (157 lines)

  On 8/20/2010 10:57 AM, David Seubert wrote:
> The Record Collector is owned by Sanders Chase. I've only met him once 
> so I will refrain from commenting on my impressions of his character, 
> but there are plenty of people on Yelp who have no shame about such 
> things.
>
> http://www.yelp.com/biz/the-record-collector-los-angeles
>
> David Seubert
>

And a further reference from one of the writers to this page.

http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/entity.php?id=6737


I'm glad this discussion came up, because after seeing his little spot 
on the Modern Marvels Retro-tech program  I was going to suggest to Cary 
that perhaps a panel on LA area record stores like this one be done at 
ARSC.  On the program he did do rants exactly like the web comments 
describe, but I didn't realize that this rant was repeated for every 
customer!!!  When a store's stock is too big, when it starts to be a 
collection rather than store stock, it usually means that the owner 
doesn;t really want to sell and thus the prices are too high.  He has 
been in business since 1974 and has been in this expensive location 
since 1999 so he must sell SOMETHING.  I think it should be illegal for 
a store to have unpriced merchandise as a policy.  Sure with a large 
stock there might be unmarked items, and certainly there are things 
which become more valuable over time, but to NEVER mark a price on 
merchandise should be illegal.  He looks like he would size you up to 
see what you could be convinced to pay, but also looks like the kind of 
guy who would not give someone a break and might get his jollies by 
having stuff that you saps can't afford.

I am trying to think of what I could ask for to get his scent off of my 
trail, but I know that is I ask for some items I REALLY do want, the 
price will now double.   I do have three strong specific wants, and I 
suppose I could as for a similar item on the hopes that maybe the ones I 
want might be in the same bin.

I've encountered stores like this in the past -- no browsing, must state 
specific wants.  What they don't understand is that if I ask for a 
specific record either they have it or not,  If they have it I buy ONE 
record.  If the don't I buy NONE.  If I browse I probably buy dozens.   
First time was in NYC in the 60s when I was in high school or college.  
It may have been Meltzer';s shop in midtown.  When challenged I said 
"Danny Kaye The Court Jester on Decca."   It was already rare and I DID 
want it.  "Got it" he said and he disappeared in the back.  I browsed 
for a minute and he came back with it.  I started to look at the disc 
and he said "No need to take it out, it's in perfect shape."  "How 
much?"  "Five bucks."  I took out the cash and then walked out with just 
one record.  I might have bought more.  And I never bothered to 
retturn.  The other time it hapopened was in Chicago, on the North Side, 
in a store I remember having to walk down a few steps to.  It was a 
Saturday, place was empty.  "No browsing.  What you want?"   I gave him 
a title.  "Nope."  Gave him another.  "Nope."  I started to browse 
again.  "No browsing."  I walked with no records.  I can think of very 
few instances when THAT happens!

I'll probably spend my record buying time during ARSC LA in Amoeba. Leah 
found some great stuff there in just the one hour before they closed.

Mike Biel  [log in to unmask]


On Aug 18, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Rod Smear wrote:
>
>> Yes, I know of him. He's on Melrose now. Same old.
>>
>> rod smear
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Cary Ginell
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 11:53 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] music man murray record collection & Murray
>> Gershenz, music collector extraordinaire, is parting with his entire
>> music library.
>>
>>
>> I remember the store on Highland. I think it was called The Record 
>> Collector. It was chiefly classical records, and a good supply of it 
>> at that. Not the bottom-of-the-barrel stuff that Murray housed. The 
>> Highland shop did have a few 10-inch jazz and folk LPs, which I 
>> scarfed up at a decent price because the snob who ran the place 
>> looked down his nose at them. It was like in the Three Stooges short 
>> where Moe, Larry, and Curly are thumbing through a stack of hundred 
>> dollar bills: $100, 200, 300, 400, 500, oh! here's a five," and they 
>> toss it away.
>>
>> Cary Ginell
>>
>>> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:22:09 -0500
>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] music man murray record collection & Murray 
>>> Gershenz, music collector extraordinaire, is parting with his entire 
>>> music library.
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> I recall the excitement when first moved to LA at the prospect of 
>>> going to
>>> Murray's. Then I went. Dashed hopes. Only to be outdone by the music 
>>> shop
>>> on Highland at Santa Monica, with a shopkeeper even more arrogant than
>>> Murray. I hate to see record (and book) shops close but when their 
>>> "owner"
>>> behaves as these folks have, give me the internet any day.
>>>
>>> Alan Carrie
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Cary Ginell <[log in to unmask]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The point differentiating "stock" from "collection" is well-taken 
>>>> in this
>>>> case. To my knowledge, Murray as never been anything but a 
>>>> shopkeeper. He
>>>> has no private collection to my knowledge and really isn't all that
>>>> concerned with the finer points of discographical research as are 
>>>> serious
>>>> collectors. He never worked hard to make his a better business. He 
>>>> just
>>>> opened his doors and expected to sell his schlock for whatever 
>>>> ridiculous
>>>> prices he posted on them. He has been reviled in L.A. for decades 
>>>> as being a
>>>> grumpy, mean, brusque, and difficult person. The last time I 
>>>> visited his
>>>> shop was maybe 25-30 years ago, when it was on Santa Monica Blvd. near
>>>> Western, a bad part of town even then. What he's got now is most 
>>>> likely the
>>>> same stuff, only rifled through even further. There may be some 
>>>> choice items
>>>> that he set aside (some of which he has displayed during 
>>>> interviews), but I
>>>> can almost guarantee that they are a miniscule percentage of his 
>>>> holdings
>>>> and certainly not representative of all that is there. If his 
>>>> business were
>>>> doing well, he wouldn't need to find a new profession at his 
>>>> advanced age.
>>>> He could have just dumped what was left and gone off to some island in
>>>> blissful retirement. But creating a new image of himself as a 
>>>> "lovable old
>>>> coot" on TV shows is easier for him and probably earns him a much 
>>>> better
>>>> income than selling records. If these records end up in a land fill
>>>> somewhere, they probably won't be missed.
>>>>
>>>> Cary Ginell
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager