On Thu, August 5, 2010 22:40, Denenberg, Ray wrote:
> I have taken The EDTF proposals and suggestions from listserv and other
> discussion and have tried to consolodate them into a single table, at
> which now attempts to capture all of the features that have at some point
> been discussed. The table provides a list of features, an example for each
> feature, and for an "extended" feature (one not supported by ISO 8601) a
> syntax is proposed.
> Comments are solicited. The most useful comments would be challenges,
> along the lines of "why do we need this feature?" For any challenged
> feature, if nobody steps up to defend it, it will be removed.
That's very useful. It chimes nicely with work currently underway on the
HTML5 working group wiki, to gather evidence in support of the use of such
values in the new <TIME> element:
I urge people to view the issues listed there; and the prior discussions
linked at the foot of that page.
Perhaps, instead of challenges and defences, we should adopt the same
model, and gather evidence of existing use (on the web or in other
systems); and use-cases?
I've already made reference to the EDTF efforts on that page; and asked
participants there to collaborate with this work.
I do know that the lack of a standard for marking up uncertain or
pre-Gregorian dates is of particular interest to colleagues in the museum,
archaeology and archives sector; and has restricted my work on the
emission of metadata from Wikipeda.