LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for DATETIME Archives


DATETIME Archives

DATETIME Archives


DATETIME@C4VLPLISTSERV01.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATETIME Home

DATETIME Home

DATETIME  November 2010

DATETIME November 2010

Subject:

Re: Julian calendar

From:

ashtongj <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 8 Nov 2010 11:54:43 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (72 lines)

If a provision is added to specify the Julian calendar, it will be
necessary to distinguish the Julian calendar as observed in Rome since
45 BC versus the Julian calendar as extrapolated backward from the
middle ages. They did not agree until around AD 8.

Gerry Ashton

On 2010-11-08 11:46 AM, Edward C. Zimmermann wrote:
> The names are, I think, the least problem--- we can just define a controlled
> vocabulary.
> The biggest problem is that calendars such as the Jewish/Hebrew don't have
> reversible transformations into Gregorian or Julian unless time and day of the
> week are also specified--- from which one could determine if its before
> sundown at the place (and, in fact, the same location may have two different
> representations for two different people as there are sometimes multiple
> customs that might be called upon to define sundown).
> Keeping to the Jewish/Hebrew calendar (and the Babylonian and other Lunisolar
> calendars as well) we also can't resolve completely against our min/sec model.
> The Jewish hour is divided into 1080 units: 72 units per degree celestial
> rotation or 360 * 72/ 24. Going back to Hebrew/Jewish now from a transformed
> date, however, won't work since the Julian/Gergorian day ends at Midnight and
> there is no way to determine the date. Its roughly based upon the stars
> viewable from the location--- with good visibility--
> http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=1166&letter=S
> and so these is insufficient information in a date/time to go back.
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:06:48 -0500, Denenberg, Ray wrote
>> From: Discussion of the Developing Date/Time Standards
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Simon Grant
>> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 8:13 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [DATETIME] Extended Date/Time Format DRAFT specification for
> review through December 6
>> "3. Miscellaneous / Calendar
>> It seems a no-brainer to define "julian" as an alternative to "gregorian",
> though other calendars would presumably be more difficult, as they may have
> different components. At least, in my limited understanding, Julian and
> Gregorian calendars have the same components."
>>
>> I took my cue here from the draft VCard specification,
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-11#section-5.7, and
> also the draft HTML5 spec (at least the WHATWG version if not WC) calendar
> parameter (calscale), in which they define only the single value, 'gregorian'.
>>
>> My thinking is, I am hesitant to specify any values for calendars at all, as
> I am unaware of any established vocabulary for calendar names (however, if
> there is one, I would be interested in revisiting this issue). I am not
> terribly reluctant to specify 'gregorian' because the vCard specification uses
> that term, and even though that's a draft spec, if's a safe bet that it won't
> change. I'm sure if's a safe bet that when Julian calendars are accomodated
> the term 'julian' will be used. But there may also be good reasons why vCard
> and the HTML people didn't want to include it now, perhaps because if they did
> then the spec would need to detail the differences.
>>
>> Anyway this is open for discussion.
>>
>> --Ray
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Edward C. Zimmermann, NONMONOTONIC LAB
> Basis Systeme netzwerk, Munich Ges. des buergerl. Rechts
> Office Leo (R&D):
> Leopoldstrasse 53-55, D-80802 Munich,
> Federal Republic of Germany
> http://www.nonmonotonic.net
> Umsatz-St-ID: DE130492967
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
January 2018
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
March 2014
September 2013
May 2013
February 2013
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
May 2012
March 2012
December 2011
November 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager