On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Ray Denenberg
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Well I meant in general it won't sort, 2000-12 and 2000-24, bad example, but
> how about 2000-12 and 2000-21? 2000-21 is before 2000-12 but it will sort
> after. --Ray
a) it might be appropriate for the seasons to come after the months, and ...
b) if not, we can always adjust (in software, say, convert "21" to
"3b" or some such, depending on the sorting scheme)